Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Sep 5;16 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):288.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1515-2.

A review of health promotion funding for older adults in Europe: a cross-country comparison

Affiliations
Review

A review of health promotion funding for older adults in Europe: a cross-country comparison

Jelena Arsenijevic et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Health promotion interventions for older adults are important as they can decrease the onset and evolution of diseases and thus can reduce the medical costs related to those diseases. However, there is no comparative evidence on how those interventions are funded in European countries. The aim of this study is to explore the funding of health promotion interventions in general and health promotion interventions for older adults in particular in European countries.

Method: We use desk research to identify relevant sources of information such as official national documents, international databases and scientific articles. Fora descriptive overview on how health promotion is funded, we focus on three dimensions: who is funding health promotion, what are the contribution mechanisms and who are the collecting agents. In addition to general information on funding of health promotion, we explore how programs on health promotion for older population groups are funded.

Results: There is a great diversity in funding of health promotion in European countries. Although public sources (tax and social health insurance revenues) are still most often used, other mechanisms of funding such as private donations or European funds are also common. Furthermore, there is no clear pattern in the funding of health promotion for different population groups. This is of particular importance for health promotion for older adults where information is limited across European countries.

Conclusions: This study provides an overview of funding of health promotion interventions in European countries. The main obstacles for funding health promotion interventions are lack of information and the fragmentation in the funding of health promotion interventions for older adults.

Keywords: Europe; Funding; Health promotion; Older adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bayarsaikhan D, Muiser J. Financing health promotion. Financ Health Promot. 2007;Discussion Paper No. 4. Geneva: World Health Organization.
    1. Agren G, Berensson K. Healthy ageing: a challenge for Europe. Swed Natl Inst Public Health. 2006;2006:29.
    1. Baker LA, Cahalin LP, Gerst K, Burr JA. Productive activities and subjective well-being among older adults: The influence of number of activities and time commitment. Soc Indicators Res. 2005;73(3):431–458. doi: 10.1007/s11205-005-0805-6. - DOI
    1. Sowada C, Waldmann T. Investment in work health promotion in small and medium-sized enterprises in Germany. Zdrowie Publiczne i Zarządzanie. 2012;10(2):95–105.
    1. Wakefield SE, Poland B. Family, friend or foe? Critical reflections on the relevance and role of social capital in health promotion and community development. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(12):2819–2832. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.012. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources