Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 Sep 8;6(9):e011148.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011148.

Multivariable fractional polynomial interaction to investigate continuous effect modifiers in a meta-analysis on higher versus lower PEEP for patients with ARDS

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Multivariable fractional polynomial interaction to investigate continuous effect modifiers in a meta-analysis on higher versus lower PEEP for patients with ARDS

Benjamin Kasenda et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: A recent individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis suggested that patients with moderate or severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) benefit from higher positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ventilation strategies. However, thresholds for continuous variables (eg, hypoxaemia) are often arbitrary and linearity assumptions in regression approaches may not hold; the multivariable fractional polynomial interaction (MFPI) approach can address both problems. The objective of this study was to apply the MFPI approach to investigate interactions between four continuous patient baseline variables and higher versus lower PEEP on clinical outcomes.

Setting: Pooled data from three randomised trials in intensive care identified by a systematic review.

Participants: 2299 patients with acute lung injury requiring mechanical ventilation.

Interventions: Higher (N=1136) versus lower PEEP (N=1163) ventilation strategy.

Outcome measures: Prespecified outcomes included mortality, time to death and time-to-unassisted breathing. We examined the following continuous baseline characteristics as potential effect modifiers using MFPI: PaO2/FiO2 (arterial partial oxygen pressure/ fraction of inspired oxygen), oxygenation index, respiratory system compliance (tidal volume/(inspiratory plateau pressure-PEEP)) and body mass index (BMI).

Results: We found that for patients with PaO2/FiO2 below 150 mm Hg, but above 100 mm Hg or an oxygenation index above 12 (moderate ARDS), higher PEEP reduces hospital mortality, but the beneficial effect appears to level off for patients with very severe ARDS. Patients with mild ARDS (PaO2/FiO2 above 200 mm Hg or an oxygenation index below 10) do not seem to benefit from higher PEEP and might even be harmed. For patients with a respiratory system compliance above 40 mL/cm H2O or patients with a BMI above 35 kg/m(2), we found a trend towards reduced mortality with higher PEEP, but there is very weak statistical confidence in these findings.

Conclusions: MFPI analyses suggest a nonlinear effect modification of higher PEEP ventilation by PaO2/FiO2 and oxygenation index with reduced mortality for some patients suffering from moderate ARDS.

Study registration number: CRD42012003129.

Keywords: ARDS; IPD meta-analysis; acute lung injury; multivariable fractional polynomials; treatment interaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial flow.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Averaged TEFs based on fixed effects of each predictor-outcome pair. The vertical dashed lines include 95% of the data of the continuous predictors; the horizontal line at the OR or HR of 1 denotes equivalence of treatment effects; thus, a TEF parallel to the horizontal line indicates no treatment interaction. For the outcomes, 60 days in hospital mortality and time to death values beneath this line indicate that higher PEEP is more effective than lower PEEP. For the outcome time-to-unassisted breathing, it is the other way round. BMI, body mass index; OI, oxygenation index; PaO2/FiO2, PaO2/FiO2 ratio; PEEP, Positive end-expiratory pressure; RC, respiratory compliance; TEF, treatment effect function.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Weights for the averaged TEFs in figure 2. Fixed-effects weights were derived from the reciprocal of the variances. The shape of these curves is a result of the distribution of events and therefore also of the patient population by the respective modifier. BMI, body mass index; OI, oxygenation index; PaO2/FiO2. PaO2/FiO2 ratio; RC, respiratory compliance; TEF, treatment effect function.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Villar J, Blanco J, Añón JM et al. . The ALIEN study: incidence and outcome of acute respiratory distress syndrome in the era of lung protective ventilation. Intensive Care Med 2011;37:1932–41. 10.1007/s00134-011-2380-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Villar J, Sulemanji D, Kacmarek RM. The acute respiratory distress syndrome: incidence and mortality, has it changed? Curr Opin Crit Care 2014;20:3–9. 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000057 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT et al. , ARDS Definition Task Force. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA 2012;307:2526–33. 10.1001/jama.2012.5669 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gattinoni L, Caironi P. Refining ventilatory treatment for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. JAMA 2008;299:691–3. 10.1001/jama.299.6.691 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A et al. . Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med 2013;39:165–228. 10.1007/s00134-012-2769-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources