Factors affecting return to work after injury or illness: best evidence synthesis of systematic reviews

Carol Cancelliere¹, James Donovan², Mette Jensen Stochkendahl³, Melissa Biscardi⁴, Carlo Ammendolia⁵, Corrie Myburgh⁶, J David Cassidy⁷

Affiliations

¹ Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada ; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada.
² Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada.
³ Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.
⁴ Sports and Exercise Medicine Institute, Toronto, Ontario Canada.
⁵ Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada ; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada.
⁶ Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.
⁷ Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada ; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada ; Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark ; Division of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada.

PMID: 27610218
PMCID: PMC5015229
DOI: 10.1186/s12998-016-0113-z

Review

Factors affecting return to work after injury or illness: best evidence synthesis of systematic reviews

Carol Cancelliere et al. Chiropr Man Therap. 2016.

. 2016 Sep 8;24(1):32.

doi: 10.1186/s12998-016-0113-z. eCollection 2016.

Authors

Carol Cancelliere¹, James Donovan², Mette Jensen Stochkendahl³, Melissa Biscardi⁴, Carlo Ammendolia⁵, Corrie Myburgh⁶, J David Cassidy⁷

Affiliations

¹ Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada ; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada.
² Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada.
³ Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.
⁴ Sports and Exercise Medicine Institute, Toronto, Ontario Canada.
⁵ Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada ; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada.
⁶ Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.
⁷ Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada ; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada ; Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark ; Division of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada.

PMID: 27610218
PMCID: PMC5015229
DOI: 10.1186/s12998-016-0113-z

Abstract

Background: Work disability is a major personal, financial and public health burden. Predicting future work success is a major focus of research.

Objectives: To identify common prognostic factors for return-to-work across different health and injury conditions and to describe their association with return-to-work outcomes.

Methods: Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, Cinahl, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the grey literature were searched from January 1, 2004 to September 1, 2013. Systematic reviews addressing return-to-work in various conditions and injuries were selected. Eligible studies were critically appraised using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria to identify low risk of bias reviews.

Results: Of the 36,193 titles screened and the 94 eligible studies reviewed, 56 systematic reviews were accepted as low risk of bias. Over half of these focused on musculoskeletal disorders, which were primarily spine related (e.g., neck and low back pain). The other half of studies assessed workers with mental health or cardiovascular conditions, stroke, cancer, multiple sclerosis or other non-specified health conditions. Many factors have been assessed, but few consistently across conditions. Common factors associated with positive return-to-work outcomes were higher education and socioeconomic status, higher self-efficacy and optimistic expectations for recovery and return-to-work, lower severity of the injury/illness, return-to-work coordination, and multidisciplinary interventions that include the workplace and stakeholders. Common factors associated with negative return-to-work outcomes were older age, being female, higher pain or disability, depression, higher physical work demands, previous sick leave and unemployment, and activity limitations.

Conclusions: Expectations of recovery and return-to-work, pain and disability levels, depression, workplace factors, and access to multidisciplinary resources are important modifiable factors in progressing return-to-work across health and injury conditions. Employers, healthcare providers and other stakeholders can use this information to facilitate return-to-work for injured/ill workers regardless of the specific injury or illness. Future studies should investigate novel interventions, and other factors that may be common across health conditions.

Keywords: Absenteeism; Intervention; Presenteeism; Prognosis; Return to work; Sick leave; Work disability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

**Fig. 1**
Flow chart of literature search

See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

1. Brox JI, Storheim K, Grotle M, Tveito TH, Indahl A, Eriksen HR. Systematic review of back schools, brief education, and fear-avoidance training for chronic low back pain. Spine J. 2008;8(6):948–58. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.07.389. - DOI - PubMed
1. Campbell P, Wynne-Jones G, Muller S, Dunn KM. The influence of employment social support for risk and prognosis in nonspecific back pain: a systematic review and critical synthesis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2013;86(2):119–137. doi: 10.1007/s00420-012-0804-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
1. Carroll C, Rick J, Pilgrim H, Cameron J, Hillage J. Workplace involvement improves return to work rates among employees with back pain on long-term sick leave: a systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(8):607–21. doi: 10.3109/09638280903186301. - DOI - PubMed
1. Clay FJ, Newstead SV, McClure RJ. A systematic review of early prognostic factors for return to work following acute orthopaedic trauma. Injury. 2010;41(8):787–803. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.04.005. - DOI - PubMed
1. Dick FD, Graveling RA, Munro W, Walker-Bone K, Guideline Development G. Workplace management of upper limb disorders: a systematic review. Occup Med (Oxf) 2011;61(1):19–25. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqq174. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
- The Lens - Patent Citations Database
- scite Smart Citations

Save citation to file

Email citation

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search

Create a file for external citation management software

Your RSS Feed

Factors affecting return to work after injury or illness: best evidence synthesis of systematic reviews

Affiliations

Factors affecting return to work after injury or illness: best evidence synthesis of systematic reviews

Authors

Affiliations

Abstract

Figures

References

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources

Other Literature Sources