Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2017 Jan;32(1):19-28.
doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2639-x. Epub 2016 Sep 9.

Evaluation of the microbiome in children's appendicitis

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Evaluation of the microbiome in children's appendicitis

Martin Salö et al. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

Background/aim: The role of the microbiome has been widely discussed in the etiology of appendicitis. The primary aim was to evaluate the microbiome in the normal appendix and in appendicitis specifically divided into the three clinically and histopathologically defined grades of inflammation. Secondary aims were to examine whether there were any microbiome differences between proximal and distal appendices, and relate the microbiome with histopathological findings.

Methods: A prospective pilot study was conducted of children undergoing appendectomy for appendicitis. The diagnosis was based on histopathological analysis. Children with incidental appendectomy were used as controls. The proximal and distal mucosa from the appendices were analyzed with 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

Results: A total of 22 children, 3 controls and 19 appendicitis patients; 11 phlegmonous, 4 gangrenous, and 4 perforated appendices, were prospectively included. The amount of Fusobacterium increased and Bacteroides decreased in phlegmonous and perforated appendicitis compared to controls, but statistical significance was not reached, and this pattern was not seen in gangrenous appendicitis. No relation could be seen between different bacteria and the grade of inflammation, and there was a wide variation of abundances at phylum, genus, and species level within every specific group of patients. Further, no significant differences could be detected when comparing the microbiome in proximal and distal mucosa, which may be because the study was underpowered. A trend with more abundance of Fusobacteria in the distal mucosa was seen in appendicitis patients with obstruction (25 and 13 %, respectively, p = 0.06).

Conclusion: The pattern of microbiome differed not only between groups, but also within groups. However, no statistically significant differences could be found in the microbiome between groups or clinical conditions. No correlation between a specific bacteria and grade of inflammation was found. In the vast majority of cases of appendicitis, changes in microbiome do not seem to be the primary event. Since there seem to be differences in microbiome patterns depending on the sample site, the exact localization of biopsy sampling must be described in future studies.

Keywords: Appendicitis; Children; Microbiome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with ethical standardsFunding sourceMag-TarmFonden, Swedish Gastroenterology Society, and Development Foundation, Region Skåne, Sweden.Financial disclosureAll authors have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.Conflict of interestThe authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Microbiome analysis at phylum level of distal mucosa in patients with different grades of appendicitis compared with a control group. Phyla with a presence >2 % included in the figure
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Microbiome analysis at genus level of distal mucosa in patients with different grades of appendicitis compared with a control group. Genus with a presence >5 % included in the figure
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Microbiome analysis at phylum level of proximal and distal mucosa in different grades of appendicitis and controls
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Alpha-diversity in patients with different grades of appendicitis and controls. Alpha-diversity was investigated with phylogenetic diversity (PD whole tree) and observed species (data not shown) indexes at an even sampling depth of 4831 sequences/sample. Values presented as mean ± SD. No significant differences between groups were found

References

    1. Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;132(5):910–925. - PubMed
    1. Hutchinson R. Amyand’s hernia. J R Soc Med. 1993;86(2):104–105. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bundy DG, Byerley JS, Liles EA, Perrin EM, Katznelson J, Rice HE. Does this child have appendicitis? JAMA. 2007;298(4):438–451. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.4.438. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walker ASI. What causes appendicitis? J Clin Gastroenterol. 1990;12(2):127–129. doi: 10.1097/00004836-199004000-00002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Humes DJ, Simpson J. Acute appendicitis. BMJ. 2006;333(7567):530–534. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38940.664363.AE. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types