Clinical trials in pediatric neuro-oncology: what is missing and how we can improve
- PMID: 27616346
- PMCID: PMC5619017
- DOI: 10.2217/cns-2016-0016
Clinical trials in pediatric neuro-oncology: what is missing and how we can improve
Abstract
Brain tumors are the most common solid tumor in childhood, yet outcomes vary dramatically. High-grade gliomas have dismal outcomes with poor survival. By contrast, low-grade gliomas, have high survival rates, but children suffer from morbidity of tumor burden and therapy-associated side effects. In this article, we discuss how current trial designs often miss the opportunity to include end points beyond tumor response and thus fail to offer complete assessments of therapeutic approaches. Quality of life, neurocognitive function and neurofunctional deficits need to be considered when assessing overall success of a therapy. Herein, we identify specific end points that should be included in the interpretation of clinical trial results and accordingly, offer a more comprehensive approach to treatment decision-making.
Keywords: clinical trials; late effects; neurocognition; pediatric brain tumors; quality of life.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- Hargrave D, Bartels U, Bouffet E. Diffuse brainstem glioma in children: critical review of clinical trials. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(3):241–248. - PubMed
-
- Fisher PG, Tihan T, Goldthwaite PT, et al. Outcome analysis of childhood low-grade astrocytomas. Pediatr. Blood Cancer. 2008;51(2):245–250. - PubMed
-
- Bamberg M, Kortmann R-D, Calaminus G, et al. Radiation therapy for intracranial germinoma: results of the German cooperative prospective trials MAKEI 83/86/89. J. Clin. Oncol. 1999;17(8):2585–2585. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical