Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Sep 7;4(3):66.
doi: 10.3390/healthcare4030066.

Review of Positive Psychology Applications in Clinical Medical Populations

Affiliations
Review

Review of Positive Psychology Applications in Clinical Medical Populations

Ann Macaskill. Healthcare (Basel). .

Abstract

This review examines the application of positive psychology concepts in physical health care contexts. Positive psychology aims to promote well-being in the general population. Studies identifying character strengths associated with well-being in healthy populations are numerous. Such strengths have been classified and Positive Psychology Interventions (PPIs) have been created to further develop these strengths in individuals. Positive psychology research is increasingly being undertaken in health care contexts. The review identified that most of this research involves measuring character strengths and their association with health outcomes in patients with a range of different conditions, similar to the position in positive psychology research on non-clinical populations. More recently, PPIs are beginning to be applied to clinical populations with physical health problems and this research, although relatively scarce, is reviewed here for cancer, coronary heart disease, and diabetes. In common with PPIs being evaluated in the general population, high quality studies are scarce. Applying PPIs to patients with serious health conditions presents significant challenges to health psychologists. They must ensure that patients are dealt with appropriately and ethically, given that exaggerated claims for PPIs are made on the internet quite frequently. This is discussed along with the need for more high quality research.

Keywords: cancer; cardiovascular disease; character strengths; diabetes; health assets; positive psychology interventions; review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study selection process [17].

References

    1. Seligman M., Csikszentmihalyi M. Positive psychology: An introduction. Am. Psychol. 2000;55:5–14. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Peterson C., Seligman M.E.P. Character Strengths and Virtues: A Classification and Handbook. American Psychological Association; Washington, DC, USA: 2004.
    1. McGrath R.E. Scale and item-level factor analyses of the VIA Inventory of Strengths. Assessment. 2012;21:4–14. doi: 10.1177/1073191112450612. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Park N., Peterson C., Seligman M.E.P. Strengths of character and wellbeing. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 2004;23:603–619. doi: 10.1521/jscp.23.5.603.50748. - DOI
    1. Rasmussen H.N., Scheier M.F., Greenhouse J.B. Optimism and physical health: A meta-analytic review. Ann. Behav. Med. 2009;37:239–256. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9111-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources