Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May;39(4):326-335.
doi: 10.1080/13803395.2016.1226267. Epub 2016 Sep 12.

Item analyses of memory differences

Affiliations

Item analyses of memory differences

Timothy A Salthouse. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2017 May.

Abstract

Objective: Although performance on memory and other cognitive tests is usually assessed with a score aggregated across multiple items, potentially valuable information is also available at the level of individual items.

Method: The current study illustrates how analyses of variance with item as one of the factors, and memorability analyses in which item accuracy in one group is plotted as a function of item accuracy in another group, can provide a more detailed characterization of the nature of group differences in memory. Data are reported for two memory tasks, word recall and story memory, across age, ability, repetition, delay, and longitudinal contrasts.

Results: The item-level analyses revealed evidence for largely uniform differences across items in the age, ability, and longitudinal contrasts, but differential patterns across items in the repetition contrast, and unsystematic item relations in the delay contrast.

Conclusion: Analyses at the level of individual items have the potential to indicate the manner by which group differences in the aggregate test score are achieved.

Keywords: Group differences; Group-by-item interactions; Memorability analysis; Score decomposition; Systematic relations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic illustration of possible outcomes from memorability analyses. Each point represents the hypothetical accuracy for an individual item averaged across participants. The X axis corresponds to performance in one group (or condition), and the Y axis correspond to performance in another group (or condition).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Serial position functions for word recall (top left) and logical memory (bottom left), and memorability functions for word recall (top right) and logical memory (bottom right) for the age contrast.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Serial position functions for word recall (top left) and logical memory (bottom left), and memorability functions for word recall (top right) and logical memory (bottom right) for the ability contrast.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Serial position functions for word recall (top left) and logical memory (bottom left), and memorability functions for word recall (top right) and logical memory (bottom right) for the repetition contrast.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Serial position functions for word recall (top left) and logical memory (bottom left), and memorability functions for word recall (top right) and logical memory (bottom right) for the delay contrast.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Serial position functions for word recall (top left) and logical memory (bottom left), and memorability functions for word recall (top right) and logical memory (bottom right) for the longitudinal contrast.

References

    1. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 1975;12:189–198. - PubMed
    1. Rubin DC. A unit analysis of prose memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1978;17:599–620.
    1. Rubin DC. Memorability as a measure of processing: A unit analysis of prose and list learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1985;114:213–238. - PubMed
    1. Salthouse TA. Correlates of cognitive change. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2014;143:1026–1048. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Salthouse TA, Pink JE, Tucker-Drob EM. Contextual analysis of fluid intelligence. Intelligence. 2008;36:464–486. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources