Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2016 Aug;8(8):E765-71.
doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.07.69.

Is there light at the end of the tunnel?-new perspectives in ECMO survival

Affiliations
Comment

Is there light at the end of the tunnel?-new perspectives in ECMO survival

Federico Pappalardo et al. J Thorac Dis. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a state of systemic hypoperfusion, secondary to a deficit in cardiac contractile activity. Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) accounts for the majority of cases of CS, with a high mortality rate, despite the great improvements in revascularisation therapy. Nowadays, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in CS often represents the only therapeutic approach able to restore systemic perfusion, determining a survival benefit. Recently, many efforts have been made to identify factors associated with mortality in patients receiving MCS devices. New insights into the pathophysiology of CS prompted the concept that the use of MCS should be considered early in the course of the disease, before the progression to multiorgan dysfunction. However, many questions remain unsolved and randomised trials in this field are hard to perform. Looking at the future, the timely implantation of temporary MCS, the correct selection of patient, the concomitant use of different temporary devices, the improvement in weaning strategies and the increasing use of durable devices as a destination or bridge therapy appear to be the most promising areas of development.

Keywords: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; myocardial infarction; shock, cardiogenic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Comment on

References

    1. Thiele H, Ohman EM, Desch S, et al. Management of cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J 2015;36:1223-30. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv051 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stretch R, Sauer CM, Yuh DD, et al. National trends in the utilization of short-term mechanical circulatory support: incidence, outcomes, and cost analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:1407-15. 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.958 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reynolds HR, Hochman JS. Cardiogenic Shock: Current Concepts and Improving Outcomes. Circulation 2008;117:686-97. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.613596 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Werdan K, Gielen S, Ebelt H, et al. Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J 2014;35:156-67. 10.1093/eurheartj/eht248 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kolte D, Khera S, Aronow WS, et al. Trends in incidence, management, and outcomes of cardiogenic shock complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the United States. J Am Heart Assoc 2014;3:e000590. 10.1161/JAHA.113.000590 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources