Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov;66(652):e786-e793.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X687085. Epub 2016 Sep 12.

Capturing patient experience: a qualitative study of implementing real-time feedback in primary care

Mary Carter  1 , Antoinette Davey  2 , Christine Wright  3 , Natasha Elmore  4 , Jenny Newbould  5 , Martin Roland  6 , John Campbell  3 , Jenni Burt  7
Affiliations

Capturing patient experience: a qualitative study of implementing real-time feedback in primary care

Mary Carter et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Background: In recent years, hospitals have made use of new technologies, such as real-time feedback, to collect patient experience information. This approach is currently rarely used in primary care settings, but may provide practices with a useful tool that enables them to take prompt, focused action to improve their services.

Aim: To identify the factors inhibiting and enabling the implementation of real-time feedback in general practices.

Design and setting: Qualitative study embedded within an exploratory trial (July 2014 to February 2015) of a real-time feedback intervention targeting patient experience in general practices in south-west England and Cambridgeshire.

Method: Semi-structured interviews (n = 22) and focus groups (n = 4, total of 28 attendees) with practice staff were audiorecorded, transcribed, and analysed thematically, using a framework based on constructs from normalisation process theory.

Results: Staff engagement with real-time feedback varied considerably, and staff made sense of real-time feedback by comparing it with more familiar feedback modalities. Effective within-team communication was associated with positive attitudes towards real-time feedback. Timing of requests for feedback was important in relation to patient engagement. Real-time feedback may offer potential as a means of informing practice development, perhaps as a component of a wider programme of capturing and responding to patients' comments.

Conclusion: Successful implementation of real-time feedback requires effective communication across the practice team to engender thorough engagement. Feedback processes should be carefully introduced to fit with existing patient and practice routines. Future studies should consider making real-time feedback content relevant to specific practice needs, and support participation by all patient groups.

Keywords: general practice; patient experience; qualitative research; survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Boiko O, Campbell JL, Elmore N, et al. The role of patient experience surveys in quality assurance and improvement: a focus group study in English general practice. Health Expect. 2015;18(6):1982–1994. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Asprey A, Campbell JL, Newbould J, et al. Challenges to the credibility of patient feedback in primary healthcare settings: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract. 2013 doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X664252. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Russell S. Patients’ experiences: top heavy with research. 2013. http://www.research-matters.com.au/publications/PatientsExperiencesRevie... (accessed 12 Aug 2016).
    1. Dirocco DN, Day SC. Obtaining patient feedback at point of service using electronic kiosks. Am J Manag Care. 2011;17(7):e270–e276. - PubMed
    1. Wofford JL, Campos CL, Jones RE, Stevens SF. Real-time patient survey data during routine clinical activities for rapid-cycle quality improvement. JMIR Med Inform. 2015;3(1):e13. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources