Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep 1:10:1691-9.
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S111328. eCollection 2016.

Comparison of self-reported quality of vision outcomes after myopic LASIK with two femtosecond lasers: a prospective, eye-to-eye study

Affiliations

Comparison of self-reported quality of vision outcomes after myopic LASIK with two femtosecond lasers: a prospective, eye-to-eye study

Christopher S Sáles et al. Clin Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Purpose: To compare self-reported quality of vision (QoV) outcomes after myopic LASIK (laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis) with two femtosecond lasers.

Design: Prospective, randomized, eye-to-eye study.

Methods: Consecutive myopic patients were treated with wavefront-guided LASIK bilaterally. Eyes were randomized according to ocular dominance. The flap of one eye was made with the IntraLase FS 60 kHz femtosecond laser with a conventional 70° side-cut, and the flap of the fellow eye was made with the IntraLase iFS 150 kHz femtosecond laser with an inverted 130° side-cut. Patients completed the validated, Rasch-tested, linear-scaled 30-item QoV questionnaire preoperatively and at Months 1, 3, 6, and 12.

Results: The study enrolled 120 fellow eyes in 60 patients. None of the measured QoV parameters exhibited statistically significant differences between the groups preoperatively or at any postoperative time point.

Conclusion: Creating LASIK flaps with an inverted side-cut using a 150 kHz femtosecond laser and with a conventional 70° side-cut using a 60 kHz femtosecond laser resulted in no significant differences in self-reported QoV assessed by the QoV questionnaire.

Keywords: LASIK; femtosecond; myopia; quality of vision; wavefront-guided.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic of inverted, left, vs conventional, right, side cut LASIK flaps. Abbreviation: LASIK, laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Self-reported QoV outcomes after femtosecond-assisted myopic LASIK with either a 130° inverted side-cut made with a 150 kHz laser or a 70° conventional side cut made with a 60 kHz laser (QoV items 1–15). Note: All P>0.05. Abbreviations: QoV, quality of vision; LASIK, laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis; pre-op, pre-operative.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Self-reported QoV outcomes after femtosecond-assisted myopic LASIK with either a 130° inverted side-cut made with a 150 kHz laser or a 70° conventional side-cut made with a 60 kHz laser (QoV items 16–30). Note: All P>0.05. Abbreviations: QoV, quality of vision; LASIK, laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis; pre-op, pre-operative.

References

    1. Sarayba MA, Ignacio TS, Binder PS, Tran DB. Comparative study of stromal bed quality by using mechanical, IntraLase femtosecond laser 15- and 30-kHz microkeratomes. Cornea. 2007;26:446–451. - PubMed
    1. Serrao S, Buratto L, Lombardo G, De Santo MP, Ducoli P, Lombardo M. Optimal parameters to improve the interface quality of the flap bed in femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38:1453–1459. - PubMed
    1. Netto MV, Mohan RR, Medeiros FW, et al. Femtosecond laser and microkeratome corneal flaps: comparison of stromal wound healing and inflammation. J Refract Surg. 2007;23:667–676. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yu CQ, Manche EE. Comparison of 2 femtosecond lasers for flap creation in myopic laser in situ keratomileusis: one-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:740–748. - PubMed
    1. Kung JS, Sales CS, Manche EE. Corneal sensation and dry eye symptoms after conventional versus inverted side-cut femtosecond LASIK: a prospective randomized study. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:2311–2316. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources