Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2016 Aug;8(8):E693-7.
doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.07.88.

Perforation of esophagus and subsequent mediastinitis following mussel shell ingestion

Affiliations
Case Reports

Perforation of esophagus and subsequent mediastinitis following mussel shell ingestion

Il Hwan Park et al. J Thorac Dis. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Esophageal perforation is a very rare occurrence because accidental swallowing of foreign bodies is uncommon in adults. Thus, perforation due to swallowing of a foreign body and subsequent development of mediastinitis is rarely encountered by physicians. We experienced such a case and described an adult male patient who had perforated esophagus after accidentally swallowing a mussel shell. The patient visited our emergency department complaining of painful dysphagia for 4 days. A review of history revealed that he consumed a spicy seafood noodle soup containing mussel shells 4 days ago. Computed tomography (CT) of the chest showed the foreign body in the esophagus and pneumomediastinum was identified. We removed the mussel shell fragment using rigid esophagoscopy; explo-thoracotomy, debridement of mediastinal abscess and irrigation were performed.

Keywords: Esophageal perforation; foreign body; mediastinitis; mussel shell.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Computed tomography (CT) of the chest showing a foreign body within the region of esophagus (arrow). The images show abscess in the mediastinum (arrowhead).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Esophageal perforation and mussel shell. (A) Esophagogastroduodenoscopy showing pus and perforation in the proximal esophagus; (B) the extracted piece of mussel shell, 2 cm × 2.5 cm in size, had a rectangular shape with very sharp edges.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Chest computed tomography (CT) showing compression of the trachea and severe mediastinitis.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Esophagography shows no extravasation of contrast dye.

References

    1. Sng KK, Koh AJ, Tan NC, et al. An Eastern perspective on oesophageal perforation: a high incidence of ingested bones. ANZ J Surg 2008;78:573-8. 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04575.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim H, Kim HK, Kang GR, et al. Successful removal of indigested shell using a rigid esophagoscope and a pneumatic lithotriptor. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:1019-21. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.01.061 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim S, Kim HH, Jang GH, et al. Mussel shell impaction in the esophagus. Case Rep Gastroenterol 2013;7:112-6. 10.1159/000350191 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eroglu A, Can Kürkçüogu I, Karaoganogu N, et al. Esophageal perforation: the importance of early diagnosis and primary repair. Dis Esophagus 2004;17:91-4. 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2004.00382.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vallböhmer D, Hölscher AH, Hölscher M, et al. Options in the management of esophageal perforation: analysis over a 12-year period. Dis Esophagus 2010;23:185-90. 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2009.01017.x - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources