Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan;20(1):74-78.
doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0243. Epub 2016 Sep 13.

Availability of Advance Care Planning Documentation for Older Emergency Department Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study

Affiliations

Availability of Advance Care Planning Documentation for Older Emergency Department Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study

Timothy F Platts-Mills et al. J Palliat Med. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

Introduction: Increasing advance care planning (ACP) among older adults is a national priority. Documentation of ACP in the electronic health record (EHR) is particularly important during emergency care.

Objective: We sought to characterize completion and availability of ACP among a subset of older patients at an academic emergency department (ED) with an integrated EHR.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, patients were eligible if aged ≥80 years or aged 65-79 with ≥1 indicator of high risk for short-term mortality. Patient-reported completion of ACP and availability of ACP documentation in the EHR were assessed.

Results: Among study patients (n = 104), 59% reported completing some form of ACP: living will 52%, heathcare power of attorney 54%, do not resuscitate 38%, and medical orders for scope of treatment or physician orders for life-sustaining treatment 6%. Whites were more likely to report having some form of ACP than minorities (66% vs. 37%, p < 0.01), as were patients aged ≥80 years than those aged 65-79 (79% vs. 44%, p < 0.01). Only 13% of all patients had either a current code status or any other current ACP documentation in the EHR. Among patients whose primary care provider uses the same EHR system as the study ED, only 19% had a current code status or any other ACP documentation in the EHR.

Conclusion: In a sample of older ED patients likely to benefit from ACP, few patients had documented end-of-life care preferences in the EHR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author Disclosure Statement No competing financial interests exist.

References

    1. Dying in America: Improving quality and honoring individual preferences near the end of life. Institute of Medicine (US). Committee on Approaching Death: Addressing Key End-of-Life Issues, 2015
    1. Suhl J, Simons P, Reedy T, Garrick T: Myth of substituted judgment: Surrogate decision making regarding life support is unreliable. Arch Intern Med 1994;154:90–96 - PubMed
    1. Gawande A: Being Mortal: Medicine and What Matters in the End. New York, New York: Macmillan, 2014
    1. Berwick DM, Hackbarth AD: Eliminating waste in US health care. JAMA 2012;307:1513–1516 - PubMed
    1. Heyland DK, Dodek P, Rocker G, et al. : What matters most in end-of-life care: Perceptions of seriously ill patients and their family members. CMAJ 2006;174:627–633 - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources