Availability of Advance Care Planning Documentation for Older Emergency Department Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
- PMID: 27622294
- PMCID: PMC5177997
- DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0243
Availability of Advance Care Planning Documentation for Older Emergency Department Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract
Introduction: Increasing advance care planning (ACP) among older adults is a national priority. Documentation of ACP in the electronic health record (EHR) is particularly important during emergency care.
Objective: We sought to characterize completion and availability of ACP among a subset of older patients at an academic emergency department (ED) with an integrated EHR.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, patients were eligible if aged ≥80 years or aged 65-79 with ≥1 indicator of high risk for short-term mortality. Patient-reported completion of ACP and availability of ACP documentation in the EHR were assessed.
Results: Among study patients (n = 104), 59% reported completing some form of ACP: living will 52%, heathcare power of attorney 54%, do not resuscitate 38%, and medical orders for scope of treatment or physician orders for life-sustaining treatment 6%. Whites were more likely to report having some form of ACP than minorities (66% vs. 37%, p < 0.01), as were patients aged ≥80 years than those aged 65-79 (79% vs. 44%, p < 0.01). Only 13% of all patients had either a current code status or any other current ACP documentation in the EHR. Among patients whose primary care provider uses the same EHR system as the study ED, only 19% had a current code status or any other ACP documentation in the EHR.
Conclusion: In a sample of older ED patients likely to benefit from ACP, few patients had documented end-of-life care preferences in the EHR.
Conflict of interest statement
Author Disclosure Statement No competing financial interests exist.
References
-
- Dying in America: Improving quality and honoring individual preferences near the end of life. Institute of Medicine (US). Committee on Approaching Death: Addressing Key End-of-Life Issues, 2015
-
- Suhl J, Simons P, Reedy T, Garrick T: Myth of substituted judgment: Surrogate decision making regarding life support is unreliable. Arch Intern Med 1994;154:90–96 - PubMed
-
- Gawande A: Being Mortal: Medicine and What Matters in the End. New York, New York: Macmillan, 2014
-
- Berwick DM, Hackbarth AD: Eliminating waste in US health care. JAMA 2012;307:1513–1516 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
