In reply: A two-stage review process for randomized controlled trials: the ultimate solution for publication bias?

Philip M Jones^{1

2}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada. philip.jones@lhsc.on.ca.
² Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada. philip.jones@lhsc.on.ca.

Comment

Philip M Jones. Can J Anaesth. 2016 Dec.

. 2016 Dec;63(12):1383.

doi: 10.1007/s12630-016-0731-x. Epub 2016 Sep 13.

Philip M Jones^{1

2}

¹ Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada. philip.jones@lhsc.on.ca.
² Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada. philip.jones@lhsc.on.ca.

No abstract available

Comment on

Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature: shifting the focus from the "positive" to the "truth".
Jones PM. Jones PM. Can J Anaesth. 2016 Jun;63(6):658-63. doi: 10.1007/s12630-016-0632-z. Epub 2016 Mar 30. Can J Anaesth. 2016. PMID: 27030132 Review. English. No abstract available.
A two-stage review process for randomized controlled trials: the ultimate solution for publication bias?
Law LS, Lo EA. Law LS, et al. Can J Anaesth. 2016 Dec;63(12):1381-1382. doi: 10.1007/s12630-016-0730-y. Epub 2016 Sep 13. Can J Anaesth. 2016. PMID: 27623801 No abstract available.