Morphometric and kinematic sperm subpopulations in split ejaculates of normozoospermic men
- PMID: 27624985
- PMCID: PMC5109871
- DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.186874
Morphometric and kinematic sperm subpopulations in split ejaculates of normozoospermic men
Abstract
This study was designed to analyze the sperm kinematic and morphometric subpopulations in the different fractions of the ejaculate in normozoospermic men. Ejaculates from eight normozoospermic men were collected by masturbation in three fractions after 3-5 days of sexual abstinence. Analyses of sperm motility by computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA-Mot), and of sperm morphometry by computer-assisted sperm morphometry analysis (CASA-Morph) using fluorescence were performed. Clustering and discriminant procedures were performed to identify sperm subpopulations in the kinematic and morphometric data obtained. Clustering procedures resulted in the classification of spermatozoa into three kinematic subpopulations (slow with low ALH [35.6% of all motile spermatozoa], with circular trajectories [32.0%], and rapid with high ALH [32.4%]), and three morphometric subpopulations (large-round [33.9% of all spermatozoa], elongated [32.0%], and small [34.10%]). The distribution of kinematic sperm subpopulations was different among ejaculate fractions (P < 0.001), with higher percentages of spermatozoa exhibiting slow movements with low ALH in the second and third portions, and with a more homogeneous distribution of kinematic sperm subpopulations in the first portion. The distribution of morphometric sperm subpopulations was also different among ejaculate fractions (P < 0.001), with more elongated spermatozoa in the first, and of small spermatozoa in the third, portion. It is concluded that important variations in the distribution of kinematic and morphometric sperm subpopulations exist between ejaculate fractions, with possible functional implications.
References
-
- Peña FJ, Saravia F, Nunez-Martinez I, Johannisson A, Wallgren M, et al. Do different portions of the boar ejaculate vary in their ability to sustain cryopreservation? Anim Reprod Sci. 2006;93:101–13. - PubMed
-
- Kareskoski AM, del Alamo MM, Guvenc K, Reilas T, Calvete JJ, et al. Protein composition of seminal plasma in fractionated stallion ejaculates. Reprod Domest Anim. 2011;46:e79–84. - PubMed
-
- Eliasson R, Lindholmer C. Distribution and properties of spermatozoa in different fractions of split ejaculates. Fertil Steril. 1972;23:252–6. - PubMed
-
- Farris EJ, Murphy DP. The characteristics of the two parts of the partitioned ejaculate and the advantages of its use for intrauterine insemination. A study of 100 ejaculates. Fertil Steril. 1960;11:465–9. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
