Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Feb;14(1):94-102.
doi: 10.1177/1740774516669352. Epub 2016 Sep 23.

A randomized study of multimedia informational aids for research on medical practices: Implications for informed consent

Stephanie A Kraft  1 , Melissa Constantine  2 , David Magnus  3 , Kathryn M Porter  1 , Sandra Soo-Jin Lee  3 , Michael Green  4 , Nancy E Kass  5 , Benjamin S Wilfond  1 , Mildred K Cho  3
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A randomized study of multimedia informational aids for research on medical practices: Implications for informed consent

Stephanie A Kraft et al. Clin Trials. 2017 Feb.

Abstract

Background/aims: Participant understanding is a key element of informed consent for enrollment in research. However, participants often do not understand the nature, risks, benefits, or design of the studies in which they take part. Research on medical practices, which studies standard interventions rather than new treatments, has the potential to be especially confusing to participants because it is embedded within usual clinical care. Our objective in this randomized study was to compare the ability of a range of multimedia informational aids to improve participant understanding in the context of research on medical practices.

Methods: We administered a web-based survey to members of a proprietary online panel sample selected to match national US demographics. Respondents were randomized to one of five arms: four content-equivalent informational aids (animated videos, slideshows with voice-over, comics, and text) and one no-intervention control. We measured knowledge of research on medical practices using a summary knowledge score from 10 questions based on the content of the informational aids. We used analysis of variance and paired t-tests to compare knowledge scores between arms.

Results: There were 1500 completed surveys (300 in each arm). Mean knowledge scores were highest for the slideshows with voice-over (65.7%), followed by the animated videos (62.7%), comics (60.7%), text (57.2%), and control (50.3%). Differences between arms were statistically significant except between the slideshows with voice-over and animated videos and between the animated videos and comics. Informational aids that included an audio component (animated videos and slideshows with voice-over) had higher knowledge scores than those without an audio component (64.2% vs 59.0%, p < .0001). There was no difference between informational aids with a character-driven story component (animated videos and comics) and those without.

Conclusion: Our results show that simple multimedia aids that use a dual-channel approach, such as voice-over with visual reinforcement, can improve participant knowledge more effectively than text alone. However, the relatively low knowledge scores suggest that targeted informational aids may be needed to teach some particularly challenging concepts. Nonetheless, our results demonstrate the potential to improve informed consent for research on medical practices using multimedia aids that include simplified language and visual metaphors.

Keywords: Research on medical practices; comparative effectiveness research; informed consent; multimedia; pragmatic clinical trials; research ethics; video.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Definition of research on medical practices
Figure 2
Figure 2
Individual knowledge questions: percent correct by arm
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 6th. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
    1. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. [accessed 15 January 2016];2008 http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/17c.pdf. - PubMed
    1. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects research. [accessed 15 January 2016];1979 http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html. - PubMed
    1. Vol. 2. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1949. [accessed 15 January 2016]. Trials of war criminals before the Nuremberg military tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10; pp. 181–182. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/archive/nurcode.html.
    1. Tait AR, Voepel-Lewis T. Digital media: a new approach for informed consent? JAMA. 2015;313:463–464. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources