Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep 14;11(9):e0162648.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162648. eCollection 2016.

The Importance of Species Name Synonyms in Literature Searches

Affiliations

The Importance of Species Name Synonyms in Literature Searches

Gerald F Guala. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The synonyms of biological species names are shown to be an important component in comprehensive searches of electronic scientific literature databases but they are not well leveraged within the major literature databases examined. For accepted or valid species names in the Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS) which have synonyms in the system, and which are found in citations within PLoS, PMC, PubMed or Scopus, both the percentage of species for which citations will not be found if synonyms are not used, and the percentage increase in number of citations found by including synonyms are very often substantial. However, there is no correlation between the number of synonyms per species and the magnitude of the effect. Further, the number of citations found does not generally increase proportionally to the number of synonyms available. Users looking for literature on specific species across all of the resources investigated here are often missing large numbers of citations if they are not manually augmenting their searches with synonyms. Of course, missing citations can have serious consequences by effectively hiding critical information. Literature searches should include synonym relationships and a new web service in ITIS, with examples of how to apply it to this issue, was developed as a result of this study, and is here announced, to aide in this.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Scopus API [Internet]. Elsevier B.V. Amsterdam (The Netherlands). Available: http://api.elsevier.com/. Accessed 2016 Jan 21.
    1. PubMed API [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK25501/. Accessed 2016 Jan 7.
    1. PMC API [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK25501/. Accessed 2016 Jan 7.
    1. PLoS API [Internet]. Public Library of Science: San Francisco (CA). Available: http://api.plos.org/. Accessed 2015 Dec 12.
    1. Integrated Taxonomic Information System [Internet]. Washington (DC). Available: http://www.ITIS.gov/

LinkOut - more resources