Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug;8(3):323-30.
doi: 10.1111/os.12257.

Treatment of Distal Femur Nonunion Following Initial Fixation with a Lateral Locking Plate

Affiliations

Treatment of Distal Femur Nonunion Following Initial Fixation with a Lateral Locking Plate

Nabil A Ebraheim et al. Orthop Surg. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To report and evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing definitive treatment for distal femur nonunion after initial treatment with a locking plate.

Methods: Fourteen patients who had undergone definitive treatment at an academic Level 1 trauma center from May 2007 to December 2013 for distal femur nonunion were identified from a fracture database. Thirteen of them were female; the average age was 65 years (range, 50-84 years). Ten patients had sustained their injuries in falls at ground level, and four in motor vehicle accidents. Twelve patients were obese (body mass index ≥30), 10 had diabetes, none were current smokers, and one had an open fracture classified as type IIIa according to the Gustilo-Anderson classification system for open fractures. The fractures were classified according to the AO classification system for distal femur fractures; there were three type 33-A1, six 33-A2, two 33-A3 and three 33-C3 fractures. Methods of definitive treatment involved open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) revision, medial plating, bone grafting and the use of other biologic materials.

Results: Eight of the 14 patients (57%) achieved union during follow-up. Definitive treatment for nonunion involved ORIF revision in 11 cases. Three patients who did not undergo ORIF revision were treated with iliac crest stem cell autografts, bone graft substitutes or recombinant human-bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rh-BMP-2). Other treatments included rh-BMP-2 (12 cases), iliac crest bone autograft (five), iliac crest stem cell autograft (two), crushed cancellous bone allograft (three), CaSO 4 and tricalcium phosphate bone graft substitute (two) and demineralized bone matrix (one). The average time from definitive treatment to union was 19 weeks (range, 12-51 weeks). Two of the 11 cases who underwent ORIF revision had medial plates added to improve biomechanical stability and prevent varus collapse. This was also performed in one patient with a grade III open type 33-C3 fracture and one with a closed 33-A2 fracture. Five study patients had comminuted fractures. Two had type 33-A3 and three type 33-C3 fractures. Both patients with 33-A3 fractures and 2 two with 33-C3 fractures had persistent nonunion at the end of follow-up.

Conclusions: Definitive treatment of distal femur nonunion after initial treatment with a locking plate had a low rate of success in this study, suggesting that this procedure is ineffective as a definitive treatment for distal femur nonunion.

Keywords: Distal femur fracture; Locking plate; Nonunion; Outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A 56‐year‐old woman (Table 1, Patient 14) with a closed 33‐A2 fracture. (A) AP view and (B) lateral view radiographs showed nonunion after treatment with ORIF with an ITS nine hole distal femur locking plate. (C) AP view and (D) lateral view radiographs showed the patient had union at 51 weeks after medial plate and rh‐BMP‐2, crushed cancellous bone allograft, demineralized bone matrix placement.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A 84‐year‐old man (Table 1, Patient 2) with a closed, type 33‐C3 fracture. (A) Preoperative anterio‐posterior (AP) view radiograph. (B) Preoperative lateral view radiograph. (C) AP and (D) lateral view radiographs showed ORIF with an ITS nine hole distal femur locking plate. (E) AP view and (F) lateral view radiographs showing no evidence of healing 3 months after initial treatment. (G) AP and (H) lateral views showing that the patient underwent ORIF revision with the addition of two screws into the nonunion site, iliac crest bone autograft and crushed cancellous bone allograft. Eight months after definitive treatment, the patient still had significant pain on weight bearing and activity and (I) AP view and (J) lateral view radiographs showed persistent nonunion.

References

    1. Kubiak EN, Fulkerson E, Strauss E, Egol KA. The evolution of locked plates. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006, 88: 189–200. - PubMed
    1. Henderson CE, Kuhl LL, Fitzpatrick DC, Marsh JL. Locking plates for distal femur fractures: is there a problem with fracture healing? J Orthop Trauma, 2011, 25: S8–S14. - PubMed
    1. Henderson CE, Lujan TJ, Kuhl LL, Bottlang M, Fitzpatrick DC, Marsh JL. 2010 mid‐America Orthopaedic apAssociation Pphysician in taTraining Aaward: healing complications are common after locked plating for distal femur fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2011, 469: 1757–1765. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kregor PJ, Stannard JA, Zlowodzki M, Cole PA. Treatment of distal femur fractures using the less invasive stabilization system: surgical experience and early clinical results in 103 fractures. J Orthop Trauma, 2004, 18: 509–520. - PubMed
    1. Syed AA, Agarwal M, Giannoudis PV, Matthews SJ, Smith RM. Distal femoral fractures: long‐term outcome following stabilization with the LISS. Injury, 2004, 35: 599–607. - PubMed

Publication types