Accounting for rate-dependent category boundary shifts in speech perception
- PMID: 27630058
- PMCID: PMC5179583
- DOI: 10.3758/s13414-016-1206-4
Accounting for rate-dependent category boundary shifts in speech perception
Abstract
The perception of temporal contrasts in speech is known to be influenced by the speech rate in the surrounding context. This rate-dependent perception is suggested to involve general auditory processes because it is also elicited by nonspeech contexts, such as pure tone sequences. Two general auditory mechanisms have been proposed to underlie rate-dependent perception: durational contrast and neural entrainment. This study compares the predictions of these two accounts of rate-dependent speech perception by means of four experiments, in which participants heard tone sequences followed by Dutch target words ambiguous between /ɑs/ "ash" and /a:s/ "bait". Tone sequences varied in the duration of tones (short vs. long) and in the presentation rate of the tones (fast vs. slow). Results show that the duration of preceding tones did not influence target perception in any of the experiments, thus challenging durational contrast as explanatory mechanism behind rate-dependent perception. Instead, the presentation rate consistently elicited a category boundary shift, with faster presentation rates inducing more /a:s/ responses, but only if the tone sequence was isochronous. Therefore, this study proposes an alternative, neurobiologically plausible account of rate-dependent perception involving neural entrainment of endogenous oscillations to the rate of a rhythmic stimulus.
Keywords: Durational contrast; Neural entrainment; Rate normalization; Rate-dependent perception; Speech rate.
Figures





References
-
- Arnal LH, Giraud A-L, Poeppel D. A neurophysiological perspective on speech processing in “The Neurobiology of Language”. In: Hickok G, Small S, editors. Neurobiology of language. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2015. pp. 463–478.
-
- Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
-
- Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2012). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [computer program]. Version 6.0.20, retrieved 3 September 2012 from http://www.praat.org/.
-
- Bosker, H. R. (2016). Our own speech rate influences speech perception. In J. Barnes, A. Brugos, S. Stattuck-Hufnagel, & N. Veilleux (Eds.), Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2016, Boston: MA, USA (pp. 227–231).
-
- Bosker, H. R., & Reinisch, E. (2015). Normalization for speechrate in native and nonnative speech. In M. Wolters, J. Livingstone, B. B. R. Smith, M. MacMahon, J. Stuart-Smith, & J. Scobbie (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 2015 [ICPhS XVIII], Glasgow (pp. 1–4).
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials