Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Aug 31:7:1366.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01366. eCollection 2016.

Interspecific Bacterial Interactions are Reflected in Multispecies Biofilm Spatial Organization

Affiliations
Review

Interspecific Bacterial Interactions are Reflected in Multispecies Biofilm Spatial Organization

Wenzheng Liu et al. Front Microbiol. .

Abstract

Interspecies interactions are essential for the persistence and development of any kind of complex community, and microbial biofilms are no exception. Multispecies biofilms are structured and spatially defined communities that have received much attention due to their omnipresence in natural environments. Species residing in these complex bacterial communities usually interact both intra- and interspecifically. Such interactions are considered to not only be fundamental in shaping overall biomass and the spatial distribution of cells residing in multispecies biofilms, but also to result in coordinated regulation of gene expression in the different species present. These communal interactions often lead to emergent properties in biofilms, such as enhanced tolerance against antibiotics, host immune responses, and other stresses, which have been shown to provide benefits to all biofilm members not only the enabling sub-populations. However, the specific molecular mechanisms of cellular processes affecting spatial organization, and vice versa, are poorly understood and very complex to unravel. Therefore, detailed description of the spatial organization of individual bacterial cells in multispecies communities can be an alternative strategy to reveal the nature of interspecies interactions of constituent species. Closing the gap between visual observation and biological processes may become crucial for resolving biofilm related problems, which is of utmost importance to environmental, industrial, and clinical implications. This review briefly presents the state of the art of studying interspecies interactions and spatial organization of multispecies communities, aiming to support theoretical and practical arguments for further advancement of this field.

Keywords: interspecies interactions; multispecies biofilms; spatial organization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Linking interspecific interactions to spatial organizations in multispecies biofilms. (A) Spatial organization of microbes in biofilms. Based on observation, there are five general forms in which the bacteria are organized: (1) intermixing; (2) layered structure without patchy patterning; (3,5) interspecific segregation; (4) layered structure with patchy patterning; (6) patchy patterning structure. Both (4) and (6) represent that one species is dominant in the biofilms. (B) Interspecific interactions. Interspecific interactions are divided into three groups based on whether species residing in multispecies communities benefit or suffer from the specific interaction: (1,2) cooperation; (3) exploitation; (4) competition. Cooperation and exploitation lead to increased biomass of one or all member species in mixed species compared to single-species biofilms (A-1,2,3,4), whereas competition results in decreased biomass of all member species in mixed species compared to single-species biofilms (A-5,6). Respectively, arrows and vertical bars represent growth facilitation and inhibition.

References

    1. Ahmed N. A., Petersen F. C., Scheie A. A. (2009). AI-2/LuxS is involved in increased biofilm formation by Streptococcus intermedius in the presence of antibiotics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53 4258–4263. 10.1128/AAC.00546-09 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Almstrand R., Daims H., Persson F., Sörensson F., Hermansson M. (2013). New methods for analysis of spatial distribution and coaggregation of microbial populations in complex biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79 5978–5987. 10.1128/AEM.01727-13 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bao K., Belibasakis G. N., Thurnheer T., Aduse-Opoku J., Curtis M. A., Bostanci N. (2014). Role of Porphyromonas gingivalis gingipains in multi-species biofilm formation. BMC Microbiol. 14:258 10.1186/s12866-014-0258-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bjarnsholt T. (2013). The role of bacterial biofilms in chronic infections. APMIS Suppl. 136 1–51. 10.1111/apm.12099 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bjarnsholt T., Alhede M., Alhede M., Eickhardt-Sørensen S. R., Moser C., Kühl M., et al. (2013). The in vivo biofilm. Trends Microbiol. 21 466–474. 10.1016/j.tim.2013.06.002 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources