Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep 15;11(9):e0162450.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162450. eCollection 2016.

Evaluation of Genotoxic Pressure along the Sava River

Stoimir Kolarević  1 , Mustafa Aborgiba  1 , Margareta Kračun-Kolarević  2 , Jovana Kostić  3 , Predrag Simonović  4 , Vladica Simić  5 , Aleksandra Milošković  5 , Georg Reischer  6 , Andreas Farnleitner  6 , Zoran Gačić  3 , Radmila Milačič  7 , Tea Zuliani  7 , Janja Vidmar  7 , Marija Pergal  8 , Marina Piria  9 , Momir Paunović  2 , Branka Vuković-Gačić  1
Affiliations

Evaluation of Genotoxic Pressure along the Sava River

Stoimir Kolarević et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

In this study we have performed a comprehensive genotoxicological survey along the 900 rkm of the Sava River. In total, 12 sites were chosen in compliance with the goals of GLOBAQUA project dealing with the effects of multiple stressors on biodiversity and functioning of aquatic ecosystems. The genotoxic potential was assessed using a complex battery of bioassays performed in prokaryotes and aquatic eukaryotes (freshwater fish). Battery comprised evaluation of mutagenicity by SOS/umuC test in Salmonella typhimurium TA1535/pSK1002. The level of DNA damage as a biomarker of exposure (comet assay) and biomarker of effect (micronucleus assay) and the level of oxidative stress as well (Fpg-modified comet assay) was studied in blood cells of bleak and spirlin (Alburnus alburnus/Alburnoides bipunctatus respectively). Result indicated differential sensitivity of applied bioassays in detection of genotoxic pressure. The standard and Fpg-modified comet assay showed higher potential in differentiation of the sites based on genotoxic potential in comparison with micronucleus assay and SOS/umuC test. Our data represent snapshot of the current status of the river which indicates the presence of genotoxic potential along the river which can be traced to the deterioration of quality of the Sava River by communal and industrial wastewaters. The major highlight of the study is that we have provided complex set of data obtained from a single source (homogeneity of analyses for all samples).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Sampling sites along the Sava River.
Fig 2
Fig 2. SOS induction rate (mean ± SE) in SOS/umuC assay.
Red line represents threshold induction value (1.5); PC—positive controls: 4NQO (0.5 μg/mL) in experiments without metabolic activation and benzo(a)pyrene (10 μg/mL) in experiments with metabolic activation.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Cryopreservation effects on the cell viability and DNA damage level.
*statistical significance in comparison with fresh sample (p < 0.05).
Fig 4
Fig 4. The values of tail intensity % obtained in standard alkaline comet assay in fish blood cells; values are represented as mean ± SE; different letters denote significant differences among studied sites (p < 0.05).
Fig 5
Fig 5. Correlation between the levels of DNA damage obtained in different assays.
Correlation of the values obtained in standard comet assay and (A) buffer exposed slides, (B) Fpg exposed slides and (C) net 8-oxoG sites; full line—regression line; dashed line—95 confidence level.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Graphical presentation of IBR.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kapetanović D, Vardić Smrzlić I, Valić D, Teskeredžić E, Kolarević S, Sunjog K, et al. Microbial characterization of the Sava River In Milačič R, Scancar J, Paunović M, editors. The Sava River. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg; 2015. pp. 201–228.
    1. Navarro-Ortega A, Acuña V, Bellin A, Burek P, Cassiani G, Choukr-Allah R, et al. Managing the effects of multiple stressors on aquatic ecosystems under water scarcity. The GLOBAQUA project. Sci. Total Environ. 2016; 503: 3–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Simić V, Petrović A, Erg B, Dimović D, Makovinska J, Karadžić B, et al. Indicative Status Assessment, Biodiversity Conservation, and Protected Areas Within the Sava River Basin In Milačič R, Scancar J, Paunović M, editors. The Sava River. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg; 2015. pp. 453–500.
    1. Jha AN. Ecotoxicological application and significance of the comet assay. Mutagenesis. 2008; 23: 207–221. 10.1093/mutage/gen014 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ščančar J, Heath E, Zuliani T, Horvat M, Kotnik J, Perko S, et al. Elements and persistent organic pollutants in the sediments of the Sava River. In Milačič R, Scancar J, Paunović M, editors. The Sava River. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg; 2015. pp. 95–121.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources