Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Dec;37(10):1522-1528.
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001211.

The Enigma of Poor Performance by Adults With Cochlear Implants

Aaron C Moberly  1 , Chelsea Bates, Michael S Harris, David B Pisoni
Affiliations
Review

The Enigma of Poor Performance by Adults With Cochlear Implants

Aaron C Moberly et al. Otol Neurotol. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: Considerable unexplained variability and large individual differences exist in speech recognition outcomes for postlingually deaf adults who use cochlear implants (CIs), and a sizeable fraction of CI users can be considered "poor performers." This article summarizes our current knowledge of poor CI performance, and provides suggestions to clinicians managing these patients.

Method: Studies are reviewed pertaining to speech recognition variability in adults with hearing loss. Findings are augmented by recent studies in our laboratories examining outcomes in postlingually deaf adults with CIs.

Results: In addition to conventional clinical predictors of CI performance (e.g., amount of residual hearing, duration of deafness), factors pertaining to both "bottom-up" auditory sensitivity to the spectro-temporal details of speech, and "top-down" linguistic knowledge and neurocognitive functions contribute to CI outcomes.

Conclusions: The broad array of factors that contribute to speech recognition performance in adult CI users suggests the potential both for novel diagnostic assessment batteries to explain poor performance, and also new rehabilitation strategies for patients who exhibit poor outcomes. Moreover, this broad array of factors determining outcome performance suggests the need to treat individual CI patients using a personalized rehabilitation approach.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Firszt JB, Holden LK, Skinner MW, et al. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems. Ear Hear. 2004;25(4):375–387. - PubMed
    1. Gifford RH, Shallop JK, Peterson AM. Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: considerations for cochlear implant programs. Audiol Neurotol. 2008;13:193–205. - PubMed
    1. Holden LK, Finley CC, Firszt JB, et al. Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2013;34(3):342–360. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pisoni DB, Svirsky MA, Kirk KI, Miyamoto RT. Looking at the “stars”: A first report on the intercorrelations among measures of speech perception, intelligibility, and language development in pediatric cochlear implant users. Research on Spoken Language Processing Progress Report. 1997;21:51–91.
    1. Lenarz M, Sönmez H, Joseph G, Büchner A, Lenarz T. Long-term performance of cochlear implants in postlingually deafened adults. Otolaryng Head Neck. 2012;147(1):112–8. - PubMed