[Physicians' perception on taking care of Jehovah's witnesses]

Abstract

Purpose of the study: The goal of this study is to assess the physician's management of patients who refuse blood transfusion.

Material and methods: A questionnaire to assess the experience, the acceptance or refusal and the operating methods in case of vital risk has been realized and circulated at a national scale.

Results: A total of 793 questionnaires were sent back and analysed according to 3 different categories: anesthesiologists, physicians and surgeons. Seventy-nine percent of total respondents and 90% of anesthesiologists had had to take care of a Jehovah's Witness. In 51% of all cases, it appears to be associated with mainly relational problems with the patient or his family. Nevertheless, 83% accept to take care a Jehovah witness, the most reluctant of them being anesthesiologists. A written confirmation of blood transfusion refusal even at vital risk and a piece of written evidence of belonging to Jehovah's Witnesses are not systematically required. For them, the impossibility to foresee with certainty the need for blood transfusion represents the main barrier to the medical care of a Jehovah's Witness. In case of imminent vital risk and if there are no available alternative procedures, 67% of respondents administer blood products (89% if the patient is unconscious).

Conclusion: This situation has nothing exceptional but the medical community does not seem to know all the regulatory requirements. Generally speaking, they do not oppose the medical care of a Jehovah's Witness, but remain committed to their primary focus: to save the patient, as long as it is not an end-of-life situation.

Keywords: Blood transfusion; Ethic; Jehovah's witness; Transfusion; Témoins de Jéhovah; Éthique.