Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec;151(6):1105-1112.e10.
doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.08.054. Epub 2016 Sep 14.

Association of Proton Pump Inhibitors With Reduced Risk of Warfarin-Related Serious Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Affiliations

Association of Proton Pump Inhibitors With Reduced Risk of Warfarin-Related Serious Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Wayne A Ray et al. Gastroenterology. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Background & aims: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) might reduce the risk of serious warfarin-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding, but the evidence of their efficacy for this indication is limited. A gastroprotective effect of PPIs would be particularly important for patients who take warfarin with antiplatelet drugs or nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which further increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study of patients beginning warfarin treatment in Tennessee Medicaid and the 5% National Medicare Sample identified 97,430 new episodes of warfarin treatment with 75,720 person-years of follow-up. The study end points were hospitalizations for upper gastrointestinal bleeding potentially preventable by PPIs and for bleeding at other sites.

Results: Patients who took warfarin without PPI co-therapy had 119 hospitalizations for upper gastrointestinal bleeding per 10,000 person-years of treatment. The risk decreased by 24% among patients who received PPI co-therapy (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-0.91). There was no significant reduction in the risk of other gastrointestinal bleeding hospitalizations (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.94-1.22) or non-gastrointestinal bleeding hospitalizations (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.84-1.15) in this group. Among patients concurrently using antiplatelet drugs or NSAIDs, those without PPI co-therapy had 284 upper gastrointestinal bleeding hospitalizations per 10,000 person-years of warfarin treatment. The risk decreased by 45% (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39-0.77) with PPI co-therapy. PPI co-therapy had no significant protective effect for warfarin patients not using antiplatelet drugs or NSAIDs (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70-1.06). Findings were similar in both study populations.

Conclusions: In an analysis of patients beginning warfarin treatment in Tennessee Medicaid and the 5% National Medicare Sample, PPI co-therapy was associated with reduced risk of warfarin-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding; the greatest reduction occurred in patients also taking antiplatelet drugs or NSAIDs.

Keywords: Antiplatelet Drugs; Proton-Pump Inhibitor; Warfarin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest. There are no conflicts of interest for any author to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Medication use patterns for 7 hypothetical warfarin patients: 1) Long-term warfarin use, no other study medications 2) Two 60 day warfarin courses separated by 60 days; 3)Warfarin with PPI; 4) Warfarin + PPI + P2Y12; 5) Warfarin + P2Y12, PPI starts after warfarin; 6) 90 day warfarin course, NSAID after warfarin start and subsequently PPI; 7) Intermittent warfarin and PPI therapy.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Incidence of warfarin-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding according to PPI co-therapy. Vertical bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. Stratified by concurrent use of antiplatelet drugs or nSAIDs. Incidence for patients with no PPI co-therapy (I0) is unadjusted (confidence intervals calculated assuming Poisson distribution); that for patients with PPI co-therapy calculated as I0*HR, where HR is the adjusted hazard ratio for PPI co-therapy (confidence intervals calculated analogously). HRs adjusted for the study population (Medicaid or Medicare), demographic characteristics, warfarin indication and treatment duration, gastrointestinal disease, risk factors for warfarin-related bleeding, medications thought to affect bleeding risk, cardiovascular comorbidity, alcohol abuse, liver disease, and recent medical care utilization (See Appendix Table 3 for detailed list of covariates). Numbers below the x-axis are the number of hospitalizations for upper gastrointestinal bleeding and the person-years of warfarin treatment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Incidence of warfarin-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding according to PPI co-therapy. Vertical bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. Stratified by concurrent use of antiplatelet drugs or NSAIDs and history of risk factors for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (peptic ulcer, gastritis, abdominal pain, blood in stool/GI bleeding, anemia in past year). Incidence for patients with no PPI co-therapy (I0) is unadjusted (confidence intervals calculated assuming Poisson distribution); that for patients with PPI co-therapy calculated as I0*HR, where HR is the adjusted hazard ratio for PPI co-therapy (confidence intervals calculated analogously). HRs adjusted for the study population (Medicaid or Medicare), demographic characteristics, warfarin indication and treatment duration, gastrointestinal disease, risk factors for warfarin-related bleeding, medications thought to affect bleeding risk, cardiovascular comorbidity, alcohol abuse, liver disease, and recent medical care utilization (See Appendix Table 3 for detailed list of covariates). Numbers below the x-axis are the number of hospitalizations for upper gastrointestinal bleeding and the person-years of warfarin treatment.

References

Reference List

    1. Ray WA, Griffin MR. Use of Medicaid data for pharmacoepidemiology. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;129:837–849. - PubMed
    1. Piper JM, Ray WA, Griffin MR, Fought R, Daugherty JR, Mitchel E., Jr Methodological issues in evaluating expanded Medicaid coverage for pregnant women. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;132:561–571. - PubMed
    1. Ray WA. Population-based studies of adverse drug effects. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1592–1594. - PubMed
    1. Baillargeon J, Holmes HM, Lin YL, Raji MA, Sharma G, Kuo YF. Concurrent use of warfarin and antibiotics and the risk of bleeding in older adults. The Am J Med. 2012;125:183–189. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cunningham A, Stein CM, Chung CP, Daugherty JR, Smalley WE, Ray WA. An automated database case definition for serious bleeding related to oral anticoagulant use. Pharmacol Drug Safety. 2011;20:560–566. - PMC - PubMed

References

    1. Hankey GJ, Eikelboom JW. Dabigatran etexilate: A new oral thrombin inhibitor. Circulation. 2011;123:1436–1450. - PubMed
    1. Kantor ED, Rehm CD, Haas JS, Chan AT, Giovannucci EL. Trends in prescription drug use among adults in the United States from 1999-2012. JAMA. 2015;314:1818–1831. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wysowsky DK, Nourjah P, Swartz L. Bleeding complications with warfarin use. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(13):1414–1419. - PubMed
    1. Olsson SB Investigators ESCobotSI. Stroke prevention with the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran compared with warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (SPORTIF III): randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2003;362(9397):1691–1698. - PubMed
    1. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(12):1139–1151. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms