Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Mar;95(3):292-298.
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.09.010. Epub 2016 Sep 14.

Psychometric properties and refinement of the Reproductive Coercion Scale

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Psychometric properties and refinement of the Reproductive Coercion Scale

Heather L McCauley et al. Contraception. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: Identification and refinement of psychometric properties of the Reproductive Coercion Scale (RCS) for use in survey research and clinical practice.

Study design: Young women aged 16-29 years seeking services in 24 Pennsylvania and 5 California family planning clinics completed questionnaires. Data were pooled for analysis (n=4674), and underlying domains were assessed using Horn's Parallel Analysis and Exploratory Factor Analysis. Multidimensional Item Response Theory was used to refine the scale and assess reliability and validity of a short-form RCS.

Results: The full, nine-item RCS had two underlying domains: pregnancy coercion and condom manipulation. Five items were retained in the short form: three about pregnancy coercion (e.g., "told you not to use birth control…") and two for condom manipulation (e.g., "taken off the condom while you were having sex…"; one of these items is the combination of two original items on damaging the condom that were combined because of similar statistical properties and face validity and a third item on removing the condom was retained on its own). Recent reproductive coercion was reported by 6.7% and 6.3% of the sample with the full and short-form RCS, respectively. Characteristics of women reporting reproductive coercion were similar with both forms.

Conclusion: Findings indicate that reproductive coercion includes pregnancy coercion and deliberate manipulation of condoms to promote pregnancy. Moreover, women experience reproductive coercion across a continuum of severity. We selected items that varied in RC severity and discrimination to generate a five-item short-form RCS for survey research and clinical practice.

Implications: This study assesses the psychometric properties of the RCS, identifying pregnancy coercion and condom manipulation as underlying domains of reproductive coercion. Recommendations for using the RCS in research and clinical practice are discussed.

Keywords: Domestic violence; Family planning; Partner violence; Reproductive coercion; Unintended pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. O’Donnell L, et al. Intimate Partner Violence Among Economically Disadvantaged Young Adult Women: Associations With Adolescent Risk-Taking and Pregnancy Experiences. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2009;41(2):84–91. - PubMed
    1. Pallitto CC, Campbell JC, O’Campo P. Is Intimate Partner Violence Associated with Unintended Pregnancy? A Review of the Literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 2005;6(3):217–235. - PubMed
    1. Miller E, et al. Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy. Contraception. 2010;81(4):316–322. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miller E, et al. Recent reproductive coercion and unintended pregnancy among female family planning clients. Contraception. 2014;89(2):122–128. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Colarossi L, Dean G. Partner Violence and Abortion Characteristics. Women & Health. 2014;54(3):177–193. - PubMed

Publication types