Psychometric properties and refinement of the Reproductive Coercion Scale
- PMID: 27639927
- PMCID: PMC5789463
- DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.09.010
Psychometric properties and refinement of the Reproductive Coercion Scale
Abstract
Objective: Identification and refinement of psychometric properties of the Reproductive Coercion Scale (RCS) for use in survey research and clinical practice.
Study design: Young women aged 16-29 years seeking services in 24 Pennsylvania and 5 California family planning clinics completed questionnaires. Data were pooled for analysis (n=4674), and underlying domains were assessed using Horn's Parallel Analysis and Exploratory Factor Analysis. Multidimensional Item Response Theory was used to refine the scale and assess reliability and validity of a short-form RCS.
Results: The full, nine-item RCS had two underlying domains: pregnancy coercion and condom manipulation. Five items were retained in the short form: three about pregnancy coercion (e.g., "told you not to use birth control…") and two for condom manipulation (e.g., "taken off the condom while you were having sex…"; one of these items is the combination of two original items on damaging the condom that were combined because of similar statistical properties and face validity and a third item on removing the condom was retained on its own). Recent reproductive coercion was reported by 6.7% and 6.3% of the sample with the full and short-form RCS, respectively. Characteristics of women reporting reproductive coercion were similar with both forms.
Conclusion: Findings indicate that reproductive coercion includes pregnancy coercion and deliberate manipulation of condoms to promote pregnancy. Moreover, women experience reproductive coercion across a continuum of severity. We selected items that varied in RC severity and discrimination to generate a five-item short-form RCS for survey research and clinical practice.
Implications: This study assesses the psychometric properties of the RCS, identifying pregnancy coercion and condom manipulation as underlying domains of reproductive coercion. Recommendations for using the RCS in research and clinical practice are discussed.
Keywords: Domestic violence; Family planning; Partner violence; Reproductive coercion; Unintended pregnancy.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Validation of the short-form reproductive coercion scale with Appalachian women.Contraception. 2021 Sep;104(3):265-270. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.04.024. Epub 2021 Apr 28. Contraception. 2021. PMID: 33930381 Clinical Trial.
-
A family planning clinic-based intervention to address reproductive coercion: a cluster randomized controlled trial.Contraception. 2016 Jul;94(1):58-67. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.02.009. Epub 2016 Feb 15. Contraception. 2016. PMID: 26892333 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Abusive Experiences and Young Women's Sexual Health Outcomes: Is Condom Negotiation Self-Efficacy a Mediator?Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016 Jun;48(2):57-64. doi: 10.1363/48e8616. Epub 2016 Apr 14. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016. PMID: 27077497 Free PMC article.
-
Reproductive Coercion: A Systematic Review.Trauma Violence Abuse. 2018 Oct;19(4):371-390. doi: 10.1177/1524838016663935. Epub 2016 Aug 16. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2018. PMID: 27535921 Free PMC article.
-
Reproductive coercion: uncloaking an imbalance of social power.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jan;214(1):74-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.045. Epub 2015 Aug 24. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 26314520 Review.
Cited by
-
Correlates of reproductive coercion among college women in abusive relationships: baseline data from the college safety study.J Am Coll Health. 2022 May-Jun;70(4):1204-1211. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2020.1790570. Epub 2020 Jul 16. J Am Coll Health. 2022. PMID: 32672505 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Prevalence and correlates of reproductive coercion across ten sites: commonalities and divergence.Reprod Health. 2023 Jan 27;20(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01568-1. Reprod Health. 2023. PMID: 36707833 Free PMC article.
-
Pregnancy coercion and partner knowledge of contraceptive use among Ethiopian women.Contracept X. 2022 Sep 17;4:100084. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2022.100084. eCollection 2022. Contracept X. 2022. PMID: 36193281 Free PMC article.
-
Reproductive Coercion by Intimate Partners: Prevalence and Correlates in Canadian Individuals with the Capacity to be Pregnant.PLoS One. 2023 Aug 3;18(8):e0283240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283240. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37535635 Free PMC article.
-
Adolescent Reproductive and Sexual Coercion: Measurement Invariance in a Population-Based Sample of Male and Female High School Students.J Fam Violence. 2020 Aug;35(6):619-632. doi: 10.1007/s10896-019-00092-w. Epub 2019 Aug 28. J Fam Violence. 2020. PMID: 32327880 Free PMC article.
References
-
- O’Donnell L, et al. Intimate Partner Violence Among Economically Disadvantaged Young Adult Women: Associations With Adolescent Risk-Taking and Pregnancy Experiences. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2009;41(2):84–91. - PubMed
-
- Pallitto CC, Campbell JC, O’Campo P. Is Intimate Partner Violence Associated with Unintended Pregnancy? A Review of the Literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 2005;6(3):217–235. - PubMed
-
- Colarossi L, Dean G. Partner Violence and Abortion Characteristics. Women & Health. 2014;54(3):177–193. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources