Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep 19;11(9):e0162896.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162896. eCollection 2016.

Immunogenicity and Lupus-Like Autoantibody Production Can Be Linked to Each Other along With Type I Interferon Production in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated With Infliximab: A Retrospective Study of a Single Center Cohort

Affiliations

Immunogenicity and Lupus-Like Autoantibody Production Can Be Linked to Each Other along With Type I Interferon Production in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated With Infliximab: A Retrospective Study of a Single Center Cohort

Yuki Ishikawa et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Besides anti-drug antibodies, anti-nuclear antibodies and anti-DNA antibodies are often induced in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. We examined the association between immunogenicity, autoantibody production, and serum cytokine profiles in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with infliximab. Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (n = 57) were retrospectively examined. Serum trough levels of infliximab, anti-drug antibody, anti-nuclear antibody, and anti-DNA (Farr), anti-single-stranded DNA and anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies were measured. Interleukin-6, interferon-γ, interferon-α, and B-cell activating factor levels were also measured in the same sera. Then, we validated the association between anti-drug antibody and these serum markers along with clinical response to infliximab. Anti-drug antibodies developed in twenty-one patients (36.8%), whose serum trough levels of infliximab were significantly lower than those in anti-drug antibody-negative patients (0.09 ± 0.03 vs. 2.48 ± 0.326 μg/mL, p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in clinical backgrounds between the two groups. The anti-drug antibody-positive patients were more likely to develop anti-nuclear antibody titers of ≥ ×160 compared to the negative patients (14 to 57% vs. 17 to 33%). In addition, anti-DNA antibodies (Farr) (from 1.5 ± 0.4 to 35 ± 17 IU/mL, p = 0.0001), especially IgM-anti-double stranded DNA antibody (from 5.1 ± 0.7 to 41 ± 8.9 IU/mL, p < 0.0001), and IgG-anti-single stranded DNA antibody (from 13 ± 1.1 to 35 ± 13, p = 0.0145) were significantly increased in anti-drug antibody-positive but not in negative patients. Moreover, the anti-drug antibody-positive, but not the negative patients, showed significant increased levels of interferon-α (from 248.7 ± 102.3 to 466.8 ± 135.1 pg/mL, p = 0.0353) and B-cell activating factor (from 1073 ± 75.1 to 1387 ± 136.5 pg/mL, p = 0.0208) following infliximab treatment. The development of anti-drug antibody against infliximab and lupus-like autoantibody production in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with infliximab can be linked each other along with increased lupus-associated cytokine levels including type I interferons.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: T.F. has received grant and research support from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Pfizer Japan Inc., and Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. The sponsors were not involved in the study design; in the collection, analysis, interpretation of data; in the writing of this manuscript; or in the decision to submit the article for publication. The authors, their immediate families, and any research foundations with which they are affiliated have not received any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article. This does not alter the authors' adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Anti-drug antibody (ADA) is associated with reduced clinical response.
(A) Treatment efficacy defined as low disease activity (LDA) or remission at 6 months. Percentages and absolute numbers of each group of patients are indicated below the graphs. ADA positivity was based on the assessment of 6 months. Fisher’s exact test was used for comparison. (B) Cumulative drug retention rates. A log-rank test was used for comparison between the two groups.
Fig 2
Fig 2. The association between ADA and ANA.
(A) The proportion of ADA (n = 21) and ANA ( ×160, n = 15) positive patients at different time points after IFX treatment in the ADA-positive group. A log-rank test was used for comparison between ADA and ANA curves. (B) Changes in the ANA staining pattern before (pre) and after (post) IFX. Numbers in bar graphs indicate percentages of patients with Hom/Spe pattern of FANA. None, ANA titer was ≤ ×40; Hom/Spe, homogenous/speckled. The chi-square test was used for comparison. * p = 0.037 (ADA-negative group) and p = 0.032 (ADA-positive group), ns: not significant.
Fig 3
Fig 3. The association between ADA and anti-DNA Ab.
The baseline (pre) and the peak (post) values of anti-DNA Ab (Farr) (A), IgG-anti-dsDNA Ab (B), IgM-anti-dsDNA Ab (C), and IgG-anti-ssDNA Ab (D). The upper limit normal values are indicated by dashed lines. The post values are the highest titers observed during the follow-up periods. Each dot represents a single serum sample, and the data are presented as mean ± SEM. A paired t-test for intra-group comparison or the Mann-Whitney test for inter-group comparison was used. ns: not significant.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Serum cytokine levels before and 12 months after IFX treatment.
The pre- and post-treatment levels of IL-6, IFN-γ, IFN-α2 and BAFF were compared between ADA-positive (+) and ADA-negative (-) groups. Data are presented as mean + SEM. A paired t-test for intra-group comparison and the Mann-Whitney test for inter-group comparison were used.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Weinblatt ME, Keystone EC, Furst DE, Moreland LW, Weisman MH, Birbara CA, et al. Adalimumab, a fully human anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in patients taking concomitant methotrexate: the ARMADA trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48:35–45. 10.1002/art.10697 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bartelds GM, Krieckaert CL, Nurmohamed MT, van Schouwenburg PA, Lems WF, Twisk JW, et al. Development of antidrug antibodies against adalimumab and association with disease activity and treatment failure during long-term follow-up. JAMA. 2011;305:1460–8. 10.1001/jama.2011.406 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Schouwenburg PA, Rispens T, Wolbink GJ. Immunogenicity of anti-TNF biologic therapies for rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2013;9:164–72. 10.1038/nrrheum.2013.4 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pascual-Salcedo D, Plasencia C, Ramiro S, Nuño L, Bonilla G, Nagore D, et al. Influence of immunogenicity on the efficacy of long-term treatment with infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50:1445–52. 10.1093/rheumatology/ker124. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wolbink GJ, Vis M, Lems W, Voskuyl AE, de Groot E, Nurmohamed MT, et al. Development of antiinfliximab antibodies and relationship to clinical response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:711–5. 10.1002/art.21671 . - DOI - PubMed