Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Nov;186(11):2783-2797.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2016.07.017.

Electrical Stimulation as a Means for Improving Vision

Affiliations
Review

Electrical Stimulation as a Means for Improving Vision

Amer Sehic et al. Am J Pathol. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Evolving research has provided evidence that noninvasive electrical stimulation (ES) of the eye may be a promising therapy for either preserving or restoring vision in several retinal and optic nerve diseases. In this review, we focus on minimally invasive strategies for the delivery of ES and accordingly summarize the current literature on transcorneal, transorbital, and transpalpebral ES in both animal experiments and clinical studies. Various mechanisms are believed to underlie the effects of ES, including increased production of neurotrophic agents, improved chorioretinal blood circulation, and inhibition of proinflammatory cytokines. Different animal models have demonstrated favorable effects of ES on both the retina and the optic nerve. Promising effects of ES have also been demonstrated in clinical studies; however, all current studies have a lack of randomization and/or a control group (sham). There is thus a pressing need for a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms that govern clinical success and optimization of stimulation parameters in animal studies. In addition, such research should be followed by large, prospective, clinical studies to explore the full potential of ES. Through this review, we aim to provide insight to guide future research on ES as a potential therapy for improving vision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Different routes of electrical stimulation of the eye. The red circle represents choroidea, except for the anterior part of the eye. The gray semicircle represents the retinal pigment epithelial cells, and the yellow semicircle illustrates the retina. Image is courtesy of Håkon Raanes (Norway).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Possible neuroprotective mechanisms underlying the effects of transcorneal electrical stimulation. The cellular structure in the figure represents an enlarged image of the retina. BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor; CNTF, ciliary nerve trophic factor; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; GS, glutamine synthetase; IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor 1; MCs, Müller cells; PG, primary microglia; RGCs, retinal ganglion cells; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Leske M.C., Heijl A., Hussein M., Bengtsson B., Hyman L., Komaroff E., Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment: the early manifest glaucoma trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:48–56. - PubMed
    1. Quigley H.A., Broman A.T. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:262–267. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coleman H.R., Chan C.C., Ferris F.L., 3rd, Chew E.Y. Age-related macular degeneration. Lancet. 2008;372:1835–1845. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guadagni V., Novelli E., Piano I., Gargini C., Strettoi E. Pharmacological approaches to retinitis pigmentosa: a laboratory perspective. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2015;48:62–81. - PubMed
    1. Maeda T., Dong Z., Jin H., Sawada O., Gao S., Utkhede D., Monk W., Palczewska G., Palczewski K. QLT091001, a 9-cis-retinal analog, is well-tolerated by retinas of mice with impaired visual cycles. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:455–466. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types