Assessing outcomes for cost-utility analysis in mental health interventions: mapping mental health specific outcome measure GHQ-12 onto EQ-5D-3L
- PMID: 27644119
- PMCID: PMC5028925
- DOI: 10.1186/s12955-016-0535-2
Assessing outcomes for cost-utility analysis in mental health interventions: mapping mental health specific outcome measure GHQ-12 onto EQ-5D-3L
Abstract
Background: Many intervention-based studies aiming to improve mental health do not include a multi-attribute utility instrument (MAUI) that produces quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and it limits the applicability of the health economic analyses. This study aims to develop 'crosswalk' transformation algorithm between a measure for psychological distress General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) and MAUI EuroQoL (EQ-5D-3L).
Methods: The study is based on a survey questionnaire sent to a random sample in four counties in Sweden in 2012. The survey included GHQ-12 and EQ-5D instruments, as well as a question about self-rated health. The EQ-5D index was calculated using the UK and the Swedish tariff values. Two OLS models were used to estimate the EQ-5D health state values using the GHQ-12 as exposure, based on the respondents (n = 17, 101) of two counties. The algorithms were applied to the data from two other counties, (n = 15, 447) to check the predictive capacity of the models.
Results: The final models included gender, age, self-rated health and GHQ-12 scores as a quantitative variable. The regression equations explained 40 % (UK tariff) and 46 % (Swedish tariff) of the variances. The model showed a satisfying predictive capacity between the observed and the predicted EQ-5D index score, with Pearson correlation = 0.65 and 0.69 for the UK and Swedish models, respectively.
Conclusion: The algorithms developed in this study can be used to determine cost-effectiveness of services or interventions that use GHQ-12 as a primary outcome where the utility measures are not collected.
Keywords: Mapping; Mental health; Preference-based measures; Quality of life; Utilities.
Figures
References
-
- ONS (Office for National Statistics). Measuring what matters: National Statistician’s Reflections on the National Debate on Measuring National Well-being. Newport: Office for National Statistics. 2011.
-
- Dolan P, Peasgood T, White M. Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. J Econ Psychol. 2008;29(1):94–122. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2007.09.001. - DOI
-
- CONSTITUTION OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, WHO 2006. Avaliable at: http://www.who.int/governance/eb/who_constitution_en.pdf. Accessed 16 Sep 2015.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
