Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Sep 20:16:497.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1744-4.

Measuring safety climate in acute hospitals: Rasch analysis of the safety attitudes questionnaire

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Measuring safety climate in acute hospitals: Rasch analysis of the safety attitudes questionnaire

Sze-Ee Soh et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) is commonly used to assess staff perception of safety climate within their clinical environment. The psychometric properties of the SAQ have previously been explored with confirmatory factor analysis and found to have some issues with construct validity. This study aimed to extend the psychometric evaluations of the SAQ by using Rasch analysis.

Methods: Assessment of internal construct validity included overall fit to the Rasch model (unidimensionality), response formats, targeting, differential item functioning (DIF) and person-separation index (PSI).

Results: A total of 420 nurses completed the SAQ (response rate 60 %). Data showed overall fit to a Rasch model of expected item functioning for interval scale measurement. The questionnaire demonstrated unidimensionality confirming the appropriateness of summing the items in each domain. Score reliabilities were appropriate (internal consistency PSI 0.6-0.8). However, participants were not using the response options on the SAQ in a consistent manner. All domains demonstrated suboptimal targeting and showed compromised score precision towards higher levels of safety climate (substantial ceiling effects).

Conclusion: There was general support for the reliability of the SAQ as a measure of safety climate although it may not be able to detect small but clinically important changes in safety climate within an organisation. Further refinement of the SAQ is warranted. This may involve changing the response options and including new items to improve the overall targeting of the scale.

Trial registration: This study was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12611000332921 (21 March 2011).

Keywords: Patient safety; Rasch analysis; Safety culture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Threshold maps for SAQ domains. Note that as disordered thresholds were observed for all six items in the Teamwork Climate domain, a threshold map was not generated
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Person-item threshold distribution depicting targeting for the six domains of the SAQ. Distributions of the locations of people and items on the common logit metric (negative values = poor safety climate; positive values = good safety climate) are depicted on the upper and lower panels respectively

References

    1. Institute of Medicine . To err is human, building a safety health system. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2000.
    1. Nieva VF, Sorra J. Safety culture assessment: a tool for improving patient safety in healthcare organizations. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12(Suppl 2):ii17–23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morello RT, Lowthian JA, Barker AL, McGinnes R, Dunt D, Brand C. Strategies for improving patient safety culture in hospitals: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22:11–18. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000582. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Flin R, Burns C, Mearns K, Yule S, Robertson EM. Measuring safety climate in health care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:109–115. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014761. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Colla JB, Bracken AC, Kinney LM, Weeks WB. Measuring patient safety climate: a review of surveys. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:364–366. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014217. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types