Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug;8(4):319-25.
doi: 10.5114/jcb.2016.61933. Epub 2016 Aug 23.

Clinical implementation of a novel applicator in high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment of esophageal cancer

Affiliations

Clinical implementation of a novel applicator in high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment of esophageal cancer

Ivan M Buzurovic et al. J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, we present the clinical implementation of a novel transoral balloon centering esophageal applicator (BCEA) and the initial clinical experience in high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy treatment of esophageal cancer, using this applicator.

Material and methods: Acceptance testing and commissioning of the BCEA were performed prior to clinical use. Full performance testing was conducted including measurements of the dimensions and the catheter diameter, evaluation of the inflatable balloon consistency, visibility of the radio-opaque markers, congruence of the markers, absolute and relative accuracy of the HDR source in the applicator using the radiochromic film and source position simulator, visibility and digitization of the applicator on the computed tomography (CT) images under the clinical conditions, and reproducibility of the offset. Clinical placement of the applicator, treatment planning, treatment delivery, and patient's response to the treatment were elaborated as well.

Results: The experiments showed sub-millimeter accuracy in the source positioning with distal position at 1270 mm. The digitization (catheter reconstruction) was uncomplicated due to the good visibility of markers. The treatment planning resulted in a favorable dose distribution. This finding was pronounced for the treatment of the curvy anatomy of the lesion due to the improved repeatability and consistency of the delivered fractional dose to the patient, since the radioactive source was placed centrally within the lumen with respect to the clinical target due to the five inflatable balloons.

Conclusions: The consistency of the BCEA positioning resulted in the possibility to deliver optimized non-uniform dose along the catheter, which resulted in an increase of the dose to the cancerous tissue and lower doses to healthy tissue. A larger number of patients and long-term follow-up will be required to investigate if the delivered optimized treatment can lead to improved clinical outcomes.

Keywords: HDR; brachytherapy; esophageal cancer; optimization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Transoral balloon centering esophageal applicator. A) Five inflatable balloons (1) allow for reproducibility of the treatment setup. Radio-opaque contrast markers are visible on computed tomography and magnetic resonance images (2); B) Full view – a catheter (3) and the inflatable ports (4). Image supplied by Ancer Medical (Hialeah, FL, USA)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Anterior-posterior and lateral scout taken prior to treatment. The green markers and red arrow point to the radio-opaque markers. The markers are visible under various window and level setup as shown in A) and B) sections
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The experimental setup for testing the absolute and relative accuracy of the radioactive source placement. The treatment offset was tested using this experimental setup
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The distal position of the source – source extension. The value obtained in this test is entered into the treatment planning system to avoid the geometric displacement of the source during the treatment
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
A) Axial and B) sagittal images show the optimized dose distribution. The centrally placed catheter inside the esophagus lumen resulted in enhanced dose distribution and reproducibility in multi fractional treatment
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Axial computed tomography image showing the central placement of the radiation source (red dwell) and with respect to the inflated balloon (green arrow)
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Balloons were filled with water prior to delivery of each treatment fraction

References

    1. Gaspar LE, Nag S, Herskovic A, et al. Clinical Research Committee. American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) consensus guidelines for brachytherapy of esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997;38:127–132. - PubMed
    1. Gaspar LE. Radiation therapy for esophageal cancer: improving the therapeutic ratio. Semin Radiat Oncol. 1994;4:192–201. - PubMed
    1. Sharma V, Mahantshetty U, Dinshaw KA, et al. Palliation of advanced/recurrent esophageal carcinoma with high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;52:310–315. - PubMed
    1. Mahantshetty U, Dinshaw K, Sharma V. Palliation of advanced/recurrent carcinoma esophagus with intraluminal brachytherapy. Ind J Thor Cardiovascr Surg. 2003;19:119–123.
    1. Skowronek J, Adamska K, Suwalska M, et al. Palliative HDR brachytherapy in treatment of advanced esophageal cancer. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2000;5:111–119.

LinkOut - more resources