Eliciting the child's voice in adverse event reporting in oncology trials: Cognitive interview findings from the Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events initiative
- PMID: 27650708
- PMCID: PMC5301979
- DOI: 10.1002/pbc.26261
Eliciting the child's voice in adverse event reporting in oncology trials: Cognitive interview findings from the Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events initiative
Abstract
Background: Adverse event (AE) reporting in oncology trials is required, but current practice does not directly integrate the child's voice. The Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) is being developed to assess symptomatic AEs via child/adolescent self-report or proxy-report. This qualitative study evaluates the child's/adolescent's understanding and ability to provide valid responses to the PRO-CTCAE to inform questionnaire refinements and confirm content validity.
Procedure: From seven pediatric research hospitals, children/adolescents ages 7-15 years who were diagnosed with cancer and receiving treatment were eligible, along with their parent-proxies. The Pediatric PRO-CTCAE includes 130 questions that assess 62 symptomatic AEs capturing symptom frequency, severity, interference, or presence. Cognitive interviews with retrospective probing were completed with children in the age groups of 7-8, 9-12, and 13-15 years. The children/adolescents and proxies were interviewed independently.
Results: Two rounds of interviews involved 81 children and adolescents and 74 parent-proxies. Fifteen of the 62 AE terms were revised after Round 1, including refinements to the questions assessing symptom severity. Most participants rated the PRO-CTCAE AE items as "very easy" or "somewhat easy" and were able to read, understand, and provide valid responses to questions. A few AE items assessing rare events were challenging to understand.
Conclusions: The Pediatric and Proxy PRO-CTCAE performed well among children and adolescents and their proxies, supporting its content validity. Data from PRO-CTCAE may improve symptomatic AE reporting in clinical trials and enhance the quality of care that children receive.
Keywords: adverse events; cancer; cognitive interviews; patient-reported outcomes.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- American Cancer Soceity. Cancer Facts & Figures 2016. [Accessed May 5, 2016]; http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@research/documents/document/ac.... Published January, 2016.
-
- Bleyer A, Budd T, Montello M. Adolescents and young adults with cancer: the scope of the problem and criticality of clinical trials. Cancer. 2006;107(7 Suppl):1645–1655. - PubMed
-
- Sullivan R, Kowalczyk JR, Agarwal B, et al. New policies to address the global burden of childhood cancers. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(3):e125–e135. - PubMed
-
- National Institutes of Health. Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program CTCAE v4.0. [Accessed 2016 April 01, 2016]; http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm. Published March 3, 2016.
-
- Reeve BB, Withycombe JS, Baker JN, et al. The first step to integrating the child’s voice in adverse event reporting in oncology trials: a content validation study among pediatric oncology clinicians. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013;60(7):1231–1236. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical