Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct 17;34(44):5352-5358.
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.08.088. Epub 2016 Sep 17.

Infectivity of attenuated poxvirus vaccine vectors and immunogenicity of a raccoonpox vectored rabies vaccine in the Brazilian Free-tailed bat (Tadarida brasiliensis)

Affiliations

Infectivity of attenuated poxvirus vaccine vectors and immunogenicity of a raccoonpox vectored rabies vaccine in the Brazilian Free-tailed bat (Tadarida brasiliensis)

Ben R Stading et al. Vaccine. .

Abstract

Bats (Order Chiroptera) are an abundant group of mammals with tremendous ecological value as insectivores and plant dispersers, but their role as reservoirs of zoonotic diseases has received more attention in the last decade. With the goal of managing disease in free-ranging bats, we tested modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) and raccoon poxvirus (RCN) as potential vaccine vectors in the Brazilian Free-tailed bat (Tadarida brasiliensis), using biophotonic in vivo imaging and immunogenicity studies. Animals were administered recombinant poxviral vectors expressing the luciferase gene (MVA-luc, RCN-luc) through oronasal (ON) or intramuscular (IM) routes and subsequently monitored for bioluminescent signal indicative of viral infection. No clinical illness was noted after exposure to any of the vectors, and limited luciferase expression was observed. Higher and longer levels of expression were observed with the RCN-luc construct. When given IM, luciferase expression was limited to the site of injection, while ON exposure led to initial expression in the oral cavity, often followed by secondary replication at another location, likely the gastric mucosa or gastric associated lymphatic tissue. Viral DNA was detected in oral swabs up to 7 and 9 days post infection (dpi) for MVA and RCN, respectively. While no live virus was detected in oral swabs from MVA-infected bats, titers up to 3.88 x 104 PFU/ml were recovered from oral swabs of RCN-infected bats. Viral DNA was also detected in fecal samples from two bats inoculated IM with RCN, but no live virus was recovered. Finally, we examined the immunogenicity of a RCN based rabies vaccine (RCN-G) following ON administration. Significant rabies neutralizing antibody titers were detected in the serum of immunized bats using the rapid fluorescence focus inhibition test (RFFIT). These studies highlight the safety and immunogenicity of attenuated poxviruses and their potential use as vaccine vectors in bats.

Keywords: Bat; Chiroptera; Poxvirus; Rabies; Vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Luminescent images for bats given attenuated poxviral vectors, raccoon poxvirus (RCN) or modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) via intramuscular (IM) (A) or oronasal (ON) routes (B). Images were taken with the IVIS 200 Biophotonic imager and analyzed using the Living Image software. For each vector group, the scale of luminescence is given in photons/second/cm2/steridian (p/s/cm2/sr) which has been standardized to compare individuals over time in days post infection (DPI).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Average luciferase expression per vector by route over time for the four groups of bats given luciferase-expressing constructs. Luminescence is given in photons/second/cm2/steridian (p/s/cm2/sr). Luminescence was significantly higher (P = 0.028) for those receiving raccoon poxvirus (RCN) than modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) and also higher (P = 0.032) for those administered virus by the intramuscular (IM) route compared to the oronasal (ON) route.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Average luciferase expression after oronasal (ON) exposure to raccoon poxvirus (RCN) initially and after re-exposure. Luminescence is given in photons/second/cm2/steridian (p/s/cm2/sr). No significant difference (P = 0.33) was detected in luminescence when compared to initial exposure through 5 days post infection.
Supplementary Fig. 1
Supplementary Fig. 1
Supplementary Fig. 2
Supplementary Fig. 2
Supplementary Fig. 3
Supplementary Fig. 3

References

    1. Luis A.D., Hayman D.T.S., O’shea T.J., Cryan P.M., Gilbert A.T. A comparison of bats and rodents as reservoirs of zoonotic viruses: are bats special? Proc. Royal Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2013;280(1756):20122753. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Drexler J.F., Corman V.M., Muller M.A., Maganga G.D., Vallo P., Binger T. Bats host major mammalian paramyxoviruses. Nat. Commun. 2012;3:796. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li W., Shi Z., Yu M., Ren W., Smith C., Epstein J.H. Bats are natural reservoirs of SARS-like coronaviruses. Science. 2005 Oct;310(5):676–679. - PubMed
    1. Memish Z.A., Mishra N., Olival K.J., Fagbo S.F., Kapoor V., Epstein J.H. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus in bats, Saudi Arabia. Emerg. Infect Dis. 2013 Nov;19(11):1819–1823. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leroy E.M., Kumulungui B., Pourrut X., Rouquet P., Hassanin A., Yaba P. Fruit bats as reservoirs of Ebola virus. Nature. 2005 Dec 1;438(7068):575–576. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms