Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016;10(3):127-35.
doi: 10.15171/joddd.2016.021. Epub 2016 Aug 17.

The prevalence of dental fluorosis and exposure to fluoride in drinking water: A systematic review

Affiliations

The prevalence of dental fluorosis and exposure to fluoride in drinking water: A systematic review

Fatemeh Goodarzi et al. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2016.

Abstract

Background. Regarding the lack of comprehensive systematic review on the efficacy of water fluoridation and prevalence of dental fluorosis, the aim of the current research was to systematically study the prevalence of dental fluorosis at different levels of water fluoride in the world and lay emphasis on the amount of fluoride in drinking water. Methods. Studies were searched in PubMed, Scopus, SID, and IranMedex, with regard to inclusion criteria. Study validity was assessed with some checklists, and analyses were performed to ascertain the prevalence of dental fluorosis among individuals categorized in age groups. Results. Investigation of the heterogeneity and analysis of the subgroups revealed that in the 6-18 year age group, when water fluoride level was less than 0.7 ppm and there was exposure to water fluoride in the first 6-8 years of life, no significant heterogeneity was detected among the studies in this subgroup. Thus, the pooled estimation of dental fluorosis prevalence in this subgroup was 12.9% (95% CI: 7.5-18.3%). Furthermore, meta-regression indicated that the exposure time to fluoride in drinking water, or exposure to fluoride in supplements, diets, air, etc as well as the quality of studies had a significant relation to the difference in the prevalence of dental fluorosis. Conclusion. The results revealed no heterogeneity in just 2 subgroups, and the results of subgroups could be pooled in them. Furthermore, the number of studies included in this review considerably decreased by considering all the detected confounding factors, whereas other similar systematic reviews mentioned at most 2 factors.

Keywords: Dental fluorosis; fluorides; systematic review; water.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Horowitz H. The effectiveness of community water fluoridation in the united states. J Public Health Dent. 1996;56:253–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1996.tb02448.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dean H, Francis A, Arnold J, Elias E. Domestic water and dental caries: Vadditional studies of the relation of fluoride domestic waters to dental caries experience in 4,425 white children, aged 12 to 14 years, of 13 cities in 4 states. Public Health Rep. 1942;57:1155–79. doi: 10.2307/4584182. - DOI
    1. Dean H, Philip J, Francis A, Arnold J, Elias E. Domestic water and dental caries: iia study of 2,832 white children, aged 12-14 years, of 8 suburban chicago communities, including lactobacillus acidophilus studies of 1,761 children. Public Health Rep. 1941;56:761–92. doi: 10.2307/4583693. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Iijima Y, Takaesu Y, Inaba D, Miyazawa M, Tazawa M. Occurrence of dental fluorosis in relation to fluoride concentration of the drinking water in natural fluoride areas, kitatsugaru. J Dent Health. 1987;37:688–96. doi: 10.5834/jdh.37.688. - DOI
    1. Minoguchi H. Results of the water fluoridation for 11 years in Yamashina and some issues of water fluoridation. Bull Stom Kyoto U 1964:124-455.

LinkOut - more resources