Nasal High-Flow Therapy for Primary Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants
- PMID: 27653564
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1603694
Nasal High-Flow Therapy for Primary Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants
Abstract
Background: Treatment with nasal high-flow therapy has efficacy similar to that of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) when used as postextubation support in neonates. The efficacy of high-flow therapy as the primary means of respiratory support for preterm infants with respiratory distress has not been proved.
Methods: In this international, multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial, we assigned 564 preterm infants (gestational age, ≥28 weeks 0 days) with early respiratory distress who had not received surfactant replacement to treatment with either nasal high-flow therapy or nasal CPAP. The primary outcome was treatment failure within 72 hours after randomization. Noninferiority was determined by calculating the absolute difference in the risk of the primary outcome; the chosen margin of noninferiority was 10 percentage points. Infants in whom high-flow therapy failed could receive rescue CPAP; infants in whom CPAP failed were intubated and mechanically ventilated.
Results: Trial recruitment stopped early at the recommendation of the independent data and safety monitoring committee because of a significant difference in the primary outcome between treatment groups. Treatment failure occurred in 71 of 278 infants (25.5%) in the high-flow group and in 38 of 286 infants (13.3%) in the CPAP group (risk difference, 12.3 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.8 to 18.7; P<0.001). The rate of intubation within 72 hours did not differ significantly between the high-flow and CPAP groups (15.5% and 11.5%, respectively; risk difference, 3.9 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.7 to 9.6; P=0.17), nor did the rate of adverse events.
Conclusions: When used as primary support for preterm infants with respiratory distress, high-flow therapy resulted in a significantly higher rate of treatment failure than did CPAP. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council and others; Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12613000303741 .).
Comment in
-
Nasal continuous positive airway pressure outperforms heated high-flow nasal cannula therapy as primary respiratory therapy in preterm infants.Evid Based Med. 2017 Apr;22(2):63. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2016-110618. Epub 2017 Jan 25. Evid Based Med. 2017. PMID: 28122796 No abstract available.
-
Is high-flow nasal cannula noninferior to nasal CPAP for the initial management of preterm infants?Acta Paediatr. 2017 Sep;106(9):1537. doi: 10.1111/apa.13817. Epub 2017 Apr 17. Acta Paediatr. 2017. PMID: 28419601 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Nasal High-Flow Therapy for Newborn Infants in Special Care Nurseries.N Engl J Med. 2019 May 23;380(21):2031-2040. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812077. N Engl J Med. 2019. PMID: 31116919 Clinical Trial.
-
High-flow nasal cannulae in very preterm infants after extubation.N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 10;369(15):1425-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1300071. N Engl J Med. 2013. PMID: 24106935 Clinical Trial.
-
High-Flow Nasal Cannula versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Primary Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Neonatology. 2018;113(3):235-241. doi: 10.1159/000484400. Epub 2018 Jan 23. Neonatology. 2018. PMID: 29393237 Clinical Trial.
-
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis and up-date.Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015 Apr;50(4):402-9. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23130. Epub 2014 Nov 21. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015. PMID: 25418007 Review.
-
Systematic review of high-flow nasal cannula versus continuous positive airway pressure for primary support in preterm infants.Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2022 Jan;107(1):56-59. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-321094. Epub 2021 May 20. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2022. PMID: 34016651
Cited by
-
Predicting Lung Health Trajectories for Survivors of Preterm Birth.Front Pediatr. 2020 Jun 19;8:318. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00318. eCollection 2020. Front Pediatr. 2020. PMID: 32637389 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy vs Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Following Extubation on Liberation From Respiratory Support in Critically Ill Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2022 Apr 26;327(16):1555-1565. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.3367. JAMA. 2022. PMID: 35390113 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A multicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial, comparing nasal high flow with nasal continuous positive airway pressure as primary support for newborn infants with early respiratory distress born in Australian non-tertiary special care nurseries (the HUNTER trial): study protocol.BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 23;7(6):e016746. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016746. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28645982 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy vs Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy on Liberation From Respiratory Support in Acutely Ill Children Admitted to Pediatric Critical Care Units: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2022 Jul 12;328(2):162-172. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.9615. JAMA. 2022. PMID: 35707984 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Systematic Reviews in Neonatal Respiratory Care: Are Some Conclusions Misleading?Front Pediatr. 2020 Jan 31;8:7. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00007. eCollection 2020. Front Pediatr. 2020. PMID: 32083037 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical