Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep 21;10(9):e0004916.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004916. eCollection 2016 Sep.

Dengue Contingency Planning: From Research to Policy and Practice

Affiliations

Dengue Contingency Planning: From Research to Policy and Practice

Silvia Runge-Ranzinger et al. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Dengue is an increasingly incident disease across many parts of the world. In response, an evidence-based handbook to translate research into policy and practice was developed. This handbook facilitates contingency planning as well as the development and use of early warning and response systems for dengue fever epidemics, by identifying decision-making processes that contribute to the success or failure of dengue surveillance, as well as triggers that initiate effective responses to incipient outbreaks.

Methodology/principal findings: Available evidence was evaluated using a step-wise process that included systematic literature reviews, policymaker and stakeholder interviews, a study to assess dengue contingency planning and outbreak management in 10 countries, and a retrospective logistic regression analysis to identify alarm signals for an outbreak warning system using datasets from five dengue endemic countries. Best practices for managing a dengue outbreak are provided for key elements of a dengue contingency plan including timely contingency planning, the importance of a detailed, context-specific dengue contingency plan that clearly distinguishes between routine and outbreak interventions, surveillance systems for outbreak preparedness, outbreak definitions, alert algorithms, managerial capacity, vector control capacity, and clinical management of large caseloads. Additionally, a computer-assisted early warning system, which enables countries to identify and respond to context-specific variables that predict forthcoming dengue outbreaks, has been developed.

Conclusions/significance: Most countries do not have comprehensive, detailed contingency plans for dengue outbreaks. Countries tend to rely on intensified vector control as their outbreak response, with minimal focus on integrated management of clinical care, epidemiological, laboratory and vector surveillance, and risk communication. The Technical Handbook for Surveillance, Dengue Outbreak Prediction/ Detection and Outbreak Response seeks to provide countries with evidence-based best practices to justify the declaration of an outbreak and the mobilization of the resources required to implement an effective dengue contingency plan.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Main components of a dengue surveillance system.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Conceptual framework of dengue contingency planning.

References

    1. WHO. Scientific Working Group Report on Dengue: Meeting Report, 1–5 October 2006. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007. Available: http://www.who.int/tdr/publications/documents/swg_dengue_2.pdf.
    1. WHO. Dengue, Prevention, Treatment and Control, New Edition Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009. Available: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241547871_eng.pdf
    1. WHO. WHO Handbook for Guidelines Development Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012. Available: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/75146/1/9789241548441_eng.pdf?ua=1.
    1. Nagpal S, Sinclair D, Garner P. Has the NTD Community Neglected Evidence-Based Policy? PLOS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(7): e2238 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002238 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Francis D, Turley R, Thomson H, Weightman A, Waters E, Moore L. Supporting the needs of public health decision-makers and review authors in the UK. J Public Health. 2014: 1–3. 10.1093/pubmed/fdu089 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources