Three-Dimensional Analysis of Fibular Motion After Fixation of Syndesmotic Injuries With a Screw or Suture-Button Construct
- PMID: 27654046
- DOI: 10.1177/1071100716666865
Three-Dimensional Analysis of Fibular Motion After Fixation of Syndesmotic Injuries With a Screw or Suture-Button Construct
Abstract
Background: Suture-button constructs are an alternative to screw fixation for syndesmotic injuries, and proponents advocate that suture-button constructs may allow physiological motion of the syndesmosis. Recent biomechanical data suggest that fibular instability with syndesmotic injuries is greatest in the sagittal plane, but the design of a suture-button construct, being a rope and 2 retention washers, is most effective along the axis of the rope (in the coronal plane). Some studies report that suture-button constructs are able to constrain fibular motion in the coronal plane, but the ability of a tightrope to constrain sagittal fibular motion is unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess fibular motion in response to an external rotation stress test in a syndesmotic injury model after fixation with a screw or suture-button constructs.
Methods: Eleven fresh-frozen cadaver whole legs with intact tibia-fibula articulations were secured to a custom fixture. Fibular motion (coronal, sagittal, and rotational planes) in response to a 6.5-Nm external rotation moment applied to the foot was recorded with fluoroscopy and a high-resolution motion capture system. Measures were taken for the following syndesmotic conditions: intact, complete lateral injury, complete lateral and deltoid injury, repair with a tetracortical 4.0-mm screw, and repair with a suture button construct (Tightrope; Arthrex, Naples, FL) aimed from the lateral fibula to the anterior medial malleolus.
Results: The suture-button construct allowed significantly more sagittal plane motion than the syndesmotic screw. Measurements acquired with mortise imaging did not detect differences between the intact, lateral injury, and 2 repair conditions. External rotation of the fibula was significantly increased in both injury conditions and was not restored to intact levels with the screw or the suture-button construct.
Conclusion: A single suture-button placed from the lateral fibula to the anterior medial malleolus was unable to replicate the motion observed in the intact specimen when subjected to an external rotation stress test and allowed significantly more posterior motion of the fibula than when fixed with a screw in simulated highly unstable injuries.
Clinical relevance: Fixation of a syndesmotic injury with a single suture-button construct did not restore physiological fibular motion, which may have implications for postoperative care and clinical outcomes.
Keywords: ankle; injury; screw; suture-button construct; syndesmosis.
© The Author(s) 2016.
Similar articles
-
Arthroscopically measured syndesmotic stability after screw vs. suture button fixation in a cadaveric model.Injury. 2017 Nov;48(11):2433-2437. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.066. Epub 2017 Aug 31. Injury. 2017. PMID: 28899558
-
Biomechanical Comparison of 3 Current Ankle Syndesmosis Repair Techniques.Foot Ankle Int. 2017 Feb;38(2):200-207. doi: 10.1177/1071100716666278. Epub 2016 Oct 1. Foot Ankle Int. 2017. PMID: 27672016
-
Suture-button versus screw fixation in a syndesmosis rupture model: a biomechanical comparison.Foot Ankle Int. 2009 Apr;30(4):346-52. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2009.0346. Foot Ankle Int. 2009. PMID: 19356360
-
Acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: a systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw repair.Int Orthop. 2012 Jun;36(6):1199-206. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1500-2. Epub 2012 Feb 9. Int Orthop. 2012. PMID: 22318415 Free PMC article.
-
Biomechanical comparison of suture-button, bioabsorbable screw, and metal screw for ankle syndesmotic repair: A meta-analysis.Foot Ankle Surg. 2021 Feb;27(2):117-122. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 Apr 27. Foot Ankle Surg. 2021. PMID: 32466876 Review.
Cited by
-
Four-Dimensional CT Analysis of Normal Syndesmotic Motion.Foot Ankle Int. 2021 Nov;42(11):1491-1501. doi: 10.1177/10711007211015204. Epub 2021 Jun 4. Foot Ankle Int. 2021. PMID: 34088231 Free PMC article.
-
Syndesmotic malreduction may decrease fixation stability: a biomechanical study.J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Feb 21;15(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01584-y. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020. PMID: 32085779 Free PMC article.
-
Short and Middle Functional Outcome in the Static vs. Dynamic Fixation of Syndesmotic Injuries in Ankle Fractures: A Retrospective Case Series Study.J Clin Med. 2023 May 24;12(11):3637. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113637. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37297832 Free PMC article.
-
Optimal Tightrope Positioning for Adequate Syndesmotic Stabilization in Simulated Syndesmotic Injuries.Foot Ankle Orthop. 2025 Jun 19;10(2):24730114251342243. doi: 10.1177/24730114251342243. eCollection 2025 Apr. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2025. PMID: 40547897 Free PMC article.
-
Sagittal instability with inversion is important to evaluate after syndesmosis injury and repair: a cadaveric robotic study.J Exp Orthop. 2020 Mar 30;7(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40634-020-00234-w. J Exp Orthop. 2020. PMID: 32232587 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical