Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jan;19(1):43-53.
doi: 10.1208/s12248-016-9982-2. Epub 2016 Sep 21.

Bone Regeneration Using Gene-Activated Matrices

Affiliations
Review

Bone Regeneration Using Gene-Activated Matrices

Sheetal D'Mello et al. AAPS J. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

Gene delivery to bone is a potential therapeutic strategy for directed, sustained, and regulated protein expression. Tissue engineering strategies for bone regeneration include delivery of proteins, genes (viral and non-viral-mediated delivery), and/or cells to the bone defect site. In addition, biomimetic scaffolds and scaffolds incorporating bone anabolic agents greatly enhance the bone repair process. Regional gene therapy has the potential of enhancing bone defect healing and bone regeneration by delivering osteogenic genes locally to the osseous lesions, thereby reducing systemic toxicity and the need for using supraphysiological dosages of therapeutic proteins. By implanting gene-activated matrices (GAMs), sustained gene expression and continuous osteogenic protein production in situ can be achieved in a way that stimulates osteogenesis and bone repair within osseous defects. Critical parameters substantially affecting the therapeutic efficacy of gene therapy include the choice of osteogenic transgene(s), selection of non-viral or viral vectors, the wound environment, and the selection of ex vivo and in vivo gene delivery strategies, such as GAMs. It is critical for gene therapy applications that clinically beneficial amounts of proteins are synthesized endogenously within and around the lesion in a sustained manner. It is therefore necessary that reliable and reproducible methods of gene delivery be developed and tested for their efficacy and safety before translating into clinical practice. Practical considerations such as the age, gender, and systemic health of patients and the nature of the disease process also need to be taken into account in order to personalize the treatments and progress towards developing a clinically applicable gene therapy for healing bone defects. This review discusses tissue engineering strategies to regenerate bone with specific focus on non-viral gene delivery systems.

Keywords: bone healing; collagen scaffold; gene-activated matrix; plasmid DNA and chemically modified RNA; transcript-activated matrix.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic demonstrating the signaling networks and their cross talks involved in differentiating the mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) into osteoblasts. TGF-β induces osteogenic differentiation by activating PI3K, SMAD 2/3 and RhoA pathways.(100) FGF-2 and BMP-2 can synergistically transform mesenchymal stem cells to osteoblasts via RAS/RAF/MEK/MAPK pathway and a SMAD pathway.(101) PDGF triggers angiogenesis through cross talk between MAPK, Rho/Rac, STAT3 and PI3K pathways.(102) IGF can induce osteogenesis by activating MAPK and PI3K pathways.(103) VEGF by activating PLC, IP3 and FAK pathways can induce angiogenesis.(104, 105) WNT signaling through β-catenin can induce osteogenic differentiation of MSCs.(106) Here, PI3K – Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase, Akt/PKB – Protein kinase B, SMAD – Suppressor of mothers against decapentaplegic, RhoA – Ras homolog gene family, member A, RUNX2 - Runt-related transcription factor 2, MAPK – Mitogen-activated protein kinase, STAT – Signal transducer and activator of transcription, PLC – Phosphoinositide phospholipase C, DAG – Diacylglycerol, IP3 – Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate, NOS – Nitric oxide synthase and FAK – Focal adhesion kinase.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic of the gene activated matrices (GAMs) demonstrating the proposed mechanism of action for bone regeneration.

References

    1. Stroncek JD, Reichert WM. Overview of Wound Healing in Different Tissue Types. In: Reichert WM, editor. Indwelling Neural Implants: Strategies for Contending with the In Vivo Environment. Boca Raton (FL): 2008.
    1. Bao P, Kodra A, Tomic-Canic M, Golinko MS, Ehrlich HP, Brem H. The role of vascular endothelial growth factor in wound healing. J Surg Res. 2009;153(2):347–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.04.023. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marzona L, Pavolini B. Play and players in bone fracture healing match. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2009;6(2):159–62. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mackie EJ, Ahmed YA, Tatarczuch L, Chen KS, Mirams M. Endochondral ossification: How cartilage is converted into bone in the developing skeleton. Int J Biochem Cell B. 2008;40(1):46–62. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2007.06.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zimmermann B. Degeneration of osteoblasts involved in intramembranous ossification of fetal rat calvaria. Cell and tissue research. 1992;267(1):75–84. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances