Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep 22;7(9):e193.
doi: 10.1038/ctg.2016.50.

Hepatitis C Treatment and Barriers to Eradication

Affiliations

Hepatitis C Treatment and Barriers to Eradication

Monica A Konerman et al. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Current treatment for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) is highly efficacious, well-tolerated, and of short duration for the majority of patients. Despite the dramatic advances in therapy, there remain several barriers to disease eradication. These include deficiencies in screening, diagnosis, and access to care, and high cost of the direct-acting antiviral medications. In addition, incident cases and reinfection associated with injection drug use contribute to the persistent worldwide disease burden. This article will review the current CHC treatments, and outline the remaining gaps in therapy and barriers to disease eradication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Class I treatment recommendations for chronic hepatitis C. Treatment experienced defined as PEG-IFN/RBV only. In GT1a, need to test for NS5A RAV for EBR; need 16 weeks of therapy with RBV for high-fold RAV. *RBV needed for GT1a but not GT1b in treatment-naive patients; RBV needed for all GT1 treatment-experienced patients. ^A total of 24 weeks of therapy required for treatment-experienced patients. +This regimen only applies to treatment-experienced patients. #RBV only needed in treatment-experienced patients. EBR, ebasvir; DAS, dasabuvir; DCV, daclatasvir; GT, genotype; GZR, grazoprevir; IFN, interferon; LDV, ledipasvir; PrO, paritaprevir+ritonavir+ombitasvir; RAV, resistance-associated variant; RBV, ribavirin; SIM, simeprevir; SOF, sofosbuvir; VEL, velpatasvir.
Figure 2
Figure 2
HCV care cascade and path to disease eradication: barriers and potential solutions. DAA, direct-acting antiviral; EMR, electronic medical record; HCV, hepatitis C virus; IDU, injection drug use; PCP, primary care physician.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. AASLD-IDSA. Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis C; http://www.hcvguidelines.org.
    1. Afdhal N, Zeuzem S, Kwo P et al. Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for untreated HCV genotype 1 infection. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1889–1898. - PubMed
    1. Zeuzem S, Ghalib R, Reddy KR et al. Grazoprevir-elbasvir combination therapy for treatment-naive cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1, 4, or 6 infection: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2015; 163: 1–13. - PubMed
    1. Zeuzem S, Dusheiko GM, Salupere R et al. Sofosbuvir and ribavirin in HCV genotypes 2 and 3. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1993–2001. - PubMed
    1. Sulkowski MS, Gardiner DF, Rodriguez-Torres M et al. Daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir for previously treated or untreated chronic HCV infection. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 211–221. - PubMed