Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar;20(2):179-185.
doi: 10.1007/s10071-016-1036-8. Epub 2016 Sep 22.

Generalizing prosodic patterns by a non-vocal learning mammal

Affiliations

Generalizing prosodic patterns by a non-vocal learning mammal

Juan M Toro et al. Anim Cogn. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Prosody, a salient aspect of speech that includes rhythm and intonation, has been shown to help infants acquire some aspects of syntax. Recent studies have shown that birds of two vocal learning species are able to categorize human speech stimuli based on prosody. In the current study, we found that the non-vocal learning rat could also discriminate human speech stimuli based on prosody. Not only that, but rats were able to generalize to novel stimuli they had not been trained with, which suggests that they had not simply memorized the properties of individual stimuli, but learned a prosodic rule. When tested with stimuli with either one or three out of the four prosodic cues removed, the rats did poorly, suggesting that all cues were necessary for the rats to solve the task. This result is in contrast to results with humans and budgerigars, both of which had previously been studied using the same paradigm. Humans and budgerigars both learned the task and generalized to novel items, but were also able to solve the task with some of the cues removed. In conclusion, rats appear to have some of the perceptual abilities necessary to generalize prosodic patterns, in a similar though not identical way to the vocal learning species that have been studied.

Keywords: Operant conditioning; Prosody; Rats; Vocal learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with ethical standards Ethical approval All procedures were approved by the ethical committee from the Universitat Pompeu Fabra, the Parc de Recerca Biomedica de Barcelona (PRBB) and the Generalitat de Catalunya (reference 7872), and followed international guidelines regarding care and use of animals (Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Association). Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Waveforms illustrating the amplitude and intensity variations for the iambic and trochaic versions of the nonsense word/gapu/
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean number of responses to iambic (white columns) and trochaic (gray columns) test stimuli for the Iambic group and the Trochaic group during the generalization test

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahmed M, Mällo T, Leppänen P, Hämäläinen J, Äyräväinen L, Ruusuvirta T, Astikainen P. Mismatch brain response to speech sound changes in rats. Front Psychol. 2011;2:283. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00283. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aslin RN, Newport EL. What statistical learning can and can’t tell us about language acquisition. In: Colombo J, McCardle P, Freund L, editors. Infant pathways to language: Methods, models, and research directions Mahwah. NJ: Erlbaum; 2008. p. 1529.
    1. Cook P, Rouse A, Wilson M, Reichmuth C. A California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) Can keep the beat: motor entrainment to rhythmic auditory stimuli in a non vocal mimic. J Comp Psychol. 2013;127:412–427. doi: 10.1037/a0032345. - DOI - PubMed
    1. de la Mora D, Nespor M, Toro JM. Do humans and non-human animals share the grouping principles of the iambic—trochaic law? Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013;75:92–100. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0371-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eriksson J, Villa A. Learning of auditory equivalence classes for vowels by rats. Behav Process. 2006;73:348–359. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.08.005. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources