Generalizing prosodic patterns by a non-vocal learning mammal
- PMID: 27658675
- PMCID: PMC5306188
- DOI: 10.1007/s10071-016-1036-8
Generalizing prosodic patterns by a non-vocal learning mammal
Abstract
Prosody, a salient aspect of speech that includes rhythm and intonation, has been shown to help infants acquire some aspects of syntax. Recent studies have shown that birds of two vocal learning species are able to categorize human speech stimuli based on prosody. In the current study, we found that the non-vocal learning rat could also discriminate human speech stimuli based on prosody. Not only that, but rats were able to generalize to novel stimuli they had not been trained with, which suggests that they had not simply memorized the properties of individual stimuli, but learned a prosodic rule. When tested with stimuli with either one or three out of the four prosodic cues removed, the rats did poorly, suggesting that all cues were necessary for the rats to solve the task. This result is in contrast to results with humans and budgerigars, both of which had previously been studied using the same paradigm. Humans and budgerigars both learned the task and generalized to novel items, but were also able to solve the task with some of the cues removed. In conclusion, rats appear to have some of the perceptual abilities necessary to generalize prosodic patterns, in a similar though not identical way to the vocal learning species that have been studied.
Keywords: Operant conditioning; Prosody; Rats; Vocal learning.
Conflict of interest statement
Compliance with ethical standards Ethical approval All procedures were approved by the ethical committee from the Universitat Pompeu Fabra, the Parc de Recerca Biomedica de Barcelona (PRBB) and the Generalitat de Catalunya (reference 7872), and followed international guidelines regarding care and use of animals (Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Association). Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Phonological perception by birds: budgerigars can perceive lexical stress.Anim Cogn. 2016 May;19(3):643-54. doi: 10.1007/s10071-016-0968-3. Epub 2016 Feb 25. Anim Cogn. 2016. PMID: 26914456 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptual organization of acoustic stimuli by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): II. Vocal signals.J Comp Psychol. 1987 Dec;101(4):367-381. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.101.4.367. J Comp Psychol. 1987. PMID: 3691060
-
Constraints on vocal production learning in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulates).Learn Behav. 2021 Mar;49(1):150-158. doi: 10.3758/s13420-021-00465-6. Epub 2021 Mar 2. Learn Behav. 2021. PMID: 33651320 Free PMC article.
-
Psychoacoustic studies on the processing of vocal interjections: how to disentangle lexical and prosodic information?Prog Brain Res. 2006;156:295-302. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56016-9. Prog Brain Res. 2006. PMID: 17015087 Review.
-
Affective prosody disorders in adults with neurological conditions: A scoping review.Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Nov-Dec;58(6):1939-1954. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12909. Epub 2023 May 22. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023. PMID: 37212522
Cited by
-
Editorial: The Evolution of Rhythm Cognition: Timing in Music and Speech.Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Jun 13;11:303. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00303. eCollection 2017. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017. PMID: 28659775 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Aslin RN, Newport EL. What statistical learning can and can’t tell us about language acquisition. In: Colombo J, McCardle P, Freund L, editors. Infant pathways to language: Methods, models, and research directions Mahwah. NJ: Erlbaum; 2008. p. 1529.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources