Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep 22;15(1):489.
doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1534-9.

A novel method for mapping village-scale outdoor resting microhabitats of the primary African malaria vector, Anopheles gambiae

Affiliations

A novel method for mapping village-scale outdoor resting microhabitats of the primary African malaria vector, Anopheles gambiae

Julius R Dewald et al. Malar J. .

Abstract

Background: Knowledge of Anopheles resting habitats is needed to advance outdoor malaria vector control. This study presents a technique to map locations of resting habitats using high-resolution satellite imagery (world view 2) and probabilistic Dempster-Shafer (D-S) modelling, focused on a rural village in southern Mali, West Africa where field sampling was conducted to determine outdoor habitat preferences of Anopheles gambiae, the main vector in the study area.

Methods: A combination of supervised and manual image classification was used to derive an accurate land-cover map from the satellite image that provided classes (i.e., photosynthetically active vegetation, water bodies, wetlands, and buildings) suitable for habitat assessment. Linear fuzzy functions were applied to the different image classes to scale resting habitat covariates into a common data range (0-1) with fuzzy breakpoints parameterized experimentally through comparison with mosquito outdoor resting data. Fuzzy layers were entered into a Dempster-Shafer (D-S) weight-of-evidence model that produced pixel-based probability of resting habitat locations.

Results: The D-S model provided a highly detailed suitability map of resting locations. The results indicated a significant difference (p < 0.001) between D-S values at locations positive for An. gambiae and a set of randomly sampled points. Further, a negative binomial regression indicated that although the D-S estimates did not predict abundance (p > 0.05) subsequent analysis suggested that the D-S modelling approach may provide a reasonable estimate locations of low-to-medium An. gambiae density. These results suggest that that D-S modelling performed well in identifying presence points and specifically resting habitats.

Conclusion: The use of a D-S modelling framework for predicting the outdoor resting habitat locations provided novel information on this little-known aspect of anopheline ecology. The technique used here may be applied more broadly at different geographic scales using Google Earth, Landsat or other remotely-sensed imagery to assess the malaria vector resting habitats where outdoor control measures can reduce the burden of the disease in Africa and elsewhere.

Keywords: Anopheles; Dempster-Schafer modeling; Mali; Resting habitats; Species distribution modeling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Individual points mark the locations of the sampling locations within the study site and the colour detonates the area which each location is associated with
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Detailed images showing sampling areas and exact locations where drop nets were placed. The numbers refer to the ID given to each sampling location and correspond with the ID values found in Table 1
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Changes in D-S model values with changing distance-from-vegetation breakpoint values (no count values). The distance at which the D-S value rose above zero for all the affected sites were averaged together for the final D-break point value. The field site ID correlates with the ID values found in Table 1
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Resting catch data. The size of the yellow circles is scaled to reflect the number of mosquitoes caught in each location
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Land cover map based on WorldView 2 imagery covering the study site. The map shows the different land cover classes obtained from supervised classification and segmentation followed by manual correction to correctly delineate wetland sites
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Final Dempster-Shafer (D-S) model of outdoor resting sites (belief output) for An. gambiae. Each pixel value provides a probability estimate of An. gambiae presence
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Comparision of mosquito presence/absence with the final D-S model
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Mosquito abundances at the field sites compared to final D-S model
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Mean of D-S values for locations where An. gambiae specimens were collected versus the D-S mean for 50 randomly sampled points. Error bars show the standard deviation

References

    1. Tanner M, Savigny D. Malaria eradication back on the table. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86:82. doi: 10.2471/BLT.07.050633. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mendis K, Rietveld A, Warsame M, Bosman A, Greenwood B, Wernsdorfer WH. From malaria control to eradication: the WHO perspective. Trop Med Int Health. 2009;14:802–809. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2009.02287.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bousema T, Drakeley C. Epidemiology and infectivity of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax gametocytes in relation to malaria control and elimination. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011;24:377–410. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00051-10. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cotter C, Sturrock HJW, Hsiang MS, Liu J, Phillips AA, Hwang J, et al. The changing epidemiology of malaria elimination: new strategies for new challenges. Lancet. 2013;382:900–911. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60310-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO. World Malaria report 2014. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/world_malaria_report_2014/en/. Accessed 7 Jan 2016.

LinkOut - more resources