Blinatumomab vs historical standard therapy of adult relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia
- PMID: 27662202
- PMCID: PMC5056974
- DOI: 10.1038/bcj.2016.84
Blinatumomab vs historical standard therapy of adult relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Abstract
We compared outcomes from a single-arm study of blinatumomab in adult patients with B-precursor Ph-negative relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R ALL) with a historical data set from Europe and the United States. Estimates of complete remission (CR) and overall survival (OS) were weighted by the frequency distribution of prognostic factors in the blinatumomab trial. Outcomes were also compared between the trial and historical data using propensity score methods. The historical cohort included 694 patients with CR data and 1112 patients with OS data compared with 189 patients with CR and survival data in the blinatumomab trial. The weighted analysis revealed a CR rate of 24% (95% CI: 20-27%) and a median OS of 3.3 months (95% CI: 2.8-3.6) in the historical cohort compared with a CR/CRh rate of 43% (95% CI: 36-50%) and a median OS of 6.1 months (95% CI: 4.2-7.5) in the blinatumomab trial. Propensity score analysis estimated increased odds of CR/CRh (OR=2.68, 95% CI: 1.67-4.31) and improved OS (HR=0.536, 95% CI: 0.394-0.730) with blinatumomab. The analysis demonstrates the application of different study designs and statistical methods to compare novel therapies for R/R ALL with historical data.
Conflict of interest statement
NG and J-MR have received research support and honoraria from Pfizer and Amgen. AA has received research support from Pfizer and Amgen and honoraria from Pfizer. RB and SG have received honoraria from Amgen. AS has served on speakers' bureau and advisory boards for Amgen. VC, AK, MK and JS are employees and shareholders of Amgen; VH and TM were employees of Amgen when the study was conducted. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Comment in
-
Comment on 'Blinatumomab vs historical standard therapy of adult relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia'.Blood Cancer J. 2016 Dec 9;6(12):e509. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2016.119. Blood Cancer J. 2016. PMID: 27935578 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Katz AJ, Chia VM, Schoonen WM, Kelsh MA. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia: an assessment of international incidence, survival, and disease burden. Cancer Causes Control 2015; 26: 1627–1642. - PubMed
-
- Bassan R, Hoelzer D. Modern therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 532–543. - PubMed
-
- Fielding AK, Richards SM, Chopra R, Lazarus HM, Litzow MR, Buck G et al. Outcome of 609 adults after relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL); an MRC UKALL12/ECOG 2993 study. Blood 2007; 109: 944–950. - PubMed
-
- Tavernier E, Boiron JM, Huguet F, Bradstock K, Vey N, Kovacsovics T et al. Outcome of treatment after first relapse in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia initially treated by the LALA-94 trial. Leukemia 2007; 21: 1907–1914. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
