Health research priority setting in Zambia: a stock taking of approaches conducted from 1998 to 2015
- PMID: 27663308
- PMCID: PMC5035471
- DOI: 10.1186/s12961-016-0142-z
Health research priority setting in Zambia: a stock taking of approaches conducted from 1998 to 2015
Abstract
Background: Priority setting in health research is an emerging field. In Zambia, like many other African countries, various priority setting activities have been undertaken with a view to identify research activities to which the available resources can be targeted while at the same time maximising the health impact for resource allocation to support evidence-based decision-making. The aim of this paper is to document the key elements of the various priority setting activities that have been conducted since 1998, identifying the key lessons and providing recommendations to improve the process.
Methods: A comprehensive review of the previous priority setting activities and processes in Zambia was conducted. Both published and unpublished reports were reviewed in order to identify any research priority setting processes that have been undertaken in Zambia. We developed a framework, based on the priority setting literature, to guide our abstraction and synthesis of the literature.
Result: The earliest record of priority setting was conducted in 1998. Various priority setting approaches have been implemented in Zambia; ranging from externally driven, once-off activities to locally (in country) initiated comprehensive processes. However, there has been no systematic national process for priority setting. These priority setting processes in Zambia were characterised by limited stakeholder buy-in of the resulting national research or programmatic research agenda. Most striking was the lack of linkages between the different initiatives. There seems to have been no conscious recognition and building on previous priority-setting experiences of previous initiatives.
Conclusion: There were gaps in the priority setting processes, stakeholder engagement and application of a defined criterion. There is a need for a priority setting framework coupled with local capacity developed across a range of stakeholders.
Keywords: National health research system; Priority setting; Research for health; Zambia.
Similar articles
-
The quest for a framework for sustainable and institutionalised priority-setting for health research in a low-resource setting: the case of Zambia.Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Feb 17;16(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0268-7. Health Res Policy Syst. 2018. PMID: 29452602 Free PMC article.
-
Stakeholder involvement in health research priority setting in low income countries: the case of Zambia.Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Nov 5;4:41. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0121-3. eCollection 2018. Res Involv Engagem. 2018. PMID: 30460042 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating health research priority-setting in low-income countries: a case study of health research priority-setting in Zambia.Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Nov 7;16(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0384-z. Health Res Policy Syst. 2018. PMID: 30404639 Free PMC article.
-
Setting a Nigeria national malaria operational research agenda: the process.BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 18;18(1):459. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3224-5. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018. PMID: 29914453 Free PMC article.
-
Health sector priority setting at meso-level in lower and middle income countries: lessons learned, available options and suggested steps.Soc Sci Med. 2014 Feb;102:190-200. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.056. Epub 2013 Dec 10. Soc Sci Med. 2014. PMID: 24565157 Review.
Cited by
-
Implementation science in resource-poor countries and communities.Implement Sci. 2018 Dec 27;13(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0847-1. Implement Sci. 2018. PMID: 30587195 Free PMC article.
-
What are the research priorities for strengthening public health emergency preparedness and response in Africa?Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Oct 23;21(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01059-6. Health Res Policy Syst. 2023. PMID: 37872548 Free PMC article.
-
What do we know about evidence-informed priority setting processes to set population-level health-research agendas: an overview of reviews.Bull Natl Res Cent. 2022;46(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s42269-021-00687-8. Epub 2022 Jan 6. Bull Natl Res Cent. 2022. PMID: 35013662 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Reporting guideline for priority setting of health research (REPRISE).BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Dec 28;19(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0889-3. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019. PMID: 31883517 Free PMC article.
-
Research priority setting related to older adults: a scoping review to inform the Cochrane-Campbell Global Ageing Partnership work programme.BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 19;12(9):e063485. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063485. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 36123060 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Council on Health Research for Development. Learning Brief. Health Research Priority Setting Lessons Learned. No 2002/6. 2006. Available [online] from: http://www.cohred.org/downloads/740.pdf. Accessed 16 Sept 2016.
-
- Council on Health Research for Development. 2000. A Manual for Research Priority Setting using the ENHR Strategy. COHRED document 2000.3. Available [online] from: http://www.cohred.org/downloads/578.pdf. Accessed 16 Sept 2016.
-
- National Institute of Medical Research (NIMR). The Fourth Tanzania National Health Research Priorities. 2013. Available [online] from: http://www.nimr.or.tz/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/National-Health-Researc.... Accessed 16 Sept 2016.
-
- World Health Organization. CHOosing Interventions that are Cost Effective (WHO-CHOICE). 2008. http://www.who.int/choice/description/en/. Accessed 2 Dec 2015.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources