Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep 23;16(1):749.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2785-0.

Salivary DNA methylation panel to diagnose HPV-positive and HPV-negative head and neck cancers

Affiliations

Salivary DNA methylation panel to diagnose HPV-positive and HPV-negative head and neck cancers

Yenkai Lim et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a heterogeneous group of tumours with a typical 5 year survival rate of <40 %. DNA methylation in tumour-suppressor genes often occurs at an early stage of tumorigenesis, hence DNA methylation can be used as an early tumour biomarker. Saliva is an ideal diagnostic medium to detect early HNSCC tumour activities due to its proximity to tumour site, non-invasiveness and ease of sampling. We test the hypothesis that the surveillance of DNA methylation in five tumour-suppressor genes (RASSF1α, p16 INK4a , TIMP3, PCQAP/MED15) will allow us to diagnose HNSCC patients from a normal healthy control group as well as to discriminate between Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-positive and HPV-negative patients.

Methods: Methylation-specific PCR (MSP) was used to determine the methylation levels of RASSF1α, p16 INK4a , TIMP3 and PCQAP/MED15 in DNA isolated from saliva. Statistical analysis was carried out using non-parametric Mann-Whitney's U-test for individually methylated genes. A logistic regression analysis was carried out to determine the assay sensitivity when combing the five genes. Further, a five-fold cross-validation with a bootstrap procedure was carried out to determine how well the panel will perform in a real clinical scenario.

Results: Salivary DNA methylation levels were not affected by age. Salivary DNA methylation levels for RASSF1α, p16 INK4a , TIMP3 and PCQAP/MED15 were higher in HPV-negative HNSCC patients (n = 88) compared with a normal healthy control group (n = 122) (sensitivity of 71 % and specificity of 80 %). Conversely, DNA methylation levels for these genes were lower in HPV-positive HNSCC patients (n = 45) compared with a normal healthy control group (sensitivity of 80 % and specificity of 74 %), consistent with the proposed aetiology of HPV-positive HNSCCs.

Conclusions: Salivary DNA tumour-suppressor methylation gene panel has the potential to detect early-stage tumours in HPV-negative HNSCC patients. HPV infection was found to deregulate the methylation levels in HPV-positive HNSCC patients. Large-scale double-blinded clinical trials are crucial before this panel can potentially be integrated into a clinical setting.

Keywords: Cross-fold validation and early detection; DNA methylation; Epigenetics biomarkers; Head and neck cancers; Human Papillomavirus; Saliva; Tumour-suppressor genes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A six-point standard curve spiking of positive cell line, HeLa in oral adenosquamous cell carcinoma, CAL27 of a RASSF1α, b p16 INK4a, c TIMP3, d PCQAP 5′ and e PCQAP 3′
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Overall DNA methylation profiles in the three groups. Whisker-box plot for the methylation signatures of a RASSF1α, b p16 INK4a, c TIMP3, d PCQAP 5′ and e PCQAP 3′ in the saliva of normal healthy controls (n = 122), HPV-positive (n = 45) and HPV-negative (n = 88) HNSCC patients with inter-quartile range and median shown using non-parametric Mann-Whitney’s U-test. Significant difference between each categories were marked with * = p < 0.05; ** = p < 0.01; *** = p < 0.001; **** = p < 0.0001, respectively
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Performance of the panel in detecting HPV-negative and positive HNSCC. Carstensen’s multivariate receiver-operating characteristics curve when all of the five salivary methylation genes are combined, comparing normal healthy controls (n = 122) with HPV-negative HNSCC patients (n = 88) (blue bar); and normal healthy controls (n = 122) with HPV-positive (n = 45) HNSCC patients (red bar) respectively

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Argiris A, et al. Head and neck cancer. Lancet. 2008;371(9625):1695–709. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60728-X. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lim Y, et al. Salivary epigenetic biomarkers in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Biomark Med. 2016;10(3):301–13. doi: 10.2217/bmm.16.2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chang MC, et al. Cell-mediated immunity and head and neck cancer: with special emphasis on betel quid chewing habit. Oral Oncol. 2005;41(8):757–75. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2005.01.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Walden MJ, Aygun N. Head and neck cancer. Semin Roentgenol. 2013;48(1):75–86. doi: 10.1053/j.ro.2012.09.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pfister DG, Fury MG. New chapter in our understanding of human papillomavirus-related head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(30):3349–52. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.5754. - DOI - PubMed