Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar 15;23(6):1442-1449.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-3102. Epub 2016 Sep 23.

Radiological Image Traits Predictive of Cancer Status in Pulmonary Nodules

Affiliations

Radiological Image Traits Predictive of Cancer Status in Pulmonary Nodules

Ying Liu et al. Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Purpose: We propose a systematic methodology to quantify incidentally identified pulmonary nodules based on observed radiological traits (semantics) quantified on a point scale and a machine-learning method using these data to predict cancer status.Experimental Design: We investigated 172 patients who had low-dose CT images, with 102 and 70 patients grouped into training and validation cohorts, respectively. On the images, 24 radiological traits were systematically scored and a linear classifier was built to relate the traits to malignant status. The model was formed both with and without size descriptors to remove bias due to nodule size. The multivariate pairs formed on the training set were tested on an independent validation data set to evaluate their performance.Results: The best 4-feature set that included a size measurement (set 1), was short axis, contour, concavity, and texture, which had an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.88 (accuracy = 81%, sensitivity = 76.2%, specificity = 91.7%). If size measures were excluded, the four best features (set 2) were location, fissure attachment, lobulation, and spiculation, which had an AUROC of 0.83 (accuracy = 73.2%, sensitivity = 73.8%, specificity = 81.7%) in predicting malignancy in primary nodules. The validation test AUROC was 0.8 (accuracy = 74.3%, sensitivity = 66.7%, specificity = 75.6%) and 0.74 (accuracy = 71.4%, sensitivity = 61.9%, specificity = 75.5%) for sets 1 and 2, respectively.Conclusions: Radiological image traits are useful in predicting malignancy in lung nodules. These semantic traits can be used in combination with size-based measures to enhance prediction accuracy and reduce false-positives. Clin Cancer Res; 23(6); 1442-9. ©2016 AACR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

RJG is a consultant and shareholder in HealthMyne, Inc. and oncology-specific PACS system. No other authors of this manuscript have relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design to find discriminant Semantic features. The blocks describe the methodology followed in the manuscript. The observed radiological trait by an expert was related to outcome with a train and validation setting.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Representative slices selected based on four radiological traits (Lobulation, Border definition, Texture and Nodules in primary tumor lobe) which was found to be one of the best discriminant pairs to predict malignant nodules. The slices in panel A) correspond to malignant case (Lobulation:3, border definition:2, Texture: 3, Nodules-in-Primary-Tumor:0) and B) Benign case (Lobulation:1, border definition:1, Texture: 3, Nodules-in-Primary-Tumor:0).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) for semantic feature based predictors (blue) compared to conventional clinical parameters using Gould model (red) and on the independent validation data set. The panels below uses pairs (a) with size feature and (b) without size based features.

References

    1. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, AJ Cancer statistics. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2014;64:9–29. - PubMed
    1. Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, Fagerstrom RM, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. The New England journal of medicine. 2011;365:395–409. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Clapp JD, Clingan KL, Gareen IF, et al. Baseline characteristics of participants in the randomized national lung screening trial. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2010;102:1771–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patz EF, Jr, Pinsky P, Gatsonis C, Sicks JD, Kramer BS, Tammemagi MC, et al. Overdiagnosis in low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer. JAMA internal medicine. 2014;174:269–74. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Hartman TE, Midthun DE, Mandrekar SJ, Hillman SL, et al. CT screening for lung cancer: five-year prospective experience. Radiology. 2005;235:259–65. - PubMed