Mode of delivery affected questionnaire response rates in a birth cohort study
- PMID: 27663611
- PMCID: PMC5323059
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.09.004
Mode of delivery affected questionnaire response rates in a birth cohort study
Abstract
Objectives: Cohort studies must collect data from their participants as economically as possible, while maintaining response rates. This randomized controlled trial investigated whether offering a choice of online or paper questionnaires resulted in improved response rates compared with offering online first.
Study design and setting: Eligible participants were young people in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) study (born April 1, 1991, to December 31, 1992, in the Avon area). After exclusions, 8,795 participants were randomized. The "online first" group were invited to complete the questionnaire online. The "choice" group were also sent a paper questionnaire and offered a choice of completion method. The trial was embedded within routine data collection. The main outcome measure was the number of questionnaires returned. Data on costs were also collected.
Results: Those in the "online first" arm of the trial were less likely to return a questionnaire [adjusted odds ratio: 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82, 0.99]. The "choice" arm was more expensive (mean difference per participant £0.71; 95% CI: £0.65, £0.76). It cost an extra £47 to have one extra person to complete the questionnaire in the "choice" arm.
Conclusion: Offering a choice of completion methods (paper or online) for questionnaires in ALSPAC increased response rates but was more expensive than offering online first.
Keywords: ALSPAC; Cohort study; Mixed mode; Online questionnaire; Randomized controlled trial; Response rates.
Copyright © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
References
-
- Ben-Shlomo Y., Kuh D. A lifecourse approach to chronic disease epidemiology; conceptual models, empirical challenges and interdisciplinary perspectives. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:285–293. - PubMed
-
- Pirius C., Leridon H. Large child cohort studies across the world. Population. 2010;65(4):575–629.
-
- Hunt J.R., White E. Retaining and tracking cohort study members. Epidemiologic Rev. 1998;20:57–70. - PubMed
-
- Calderwood L. Centre for Longitudinal Studies; London: 2010. Keeping in touch with mobile families in the UK Millenium Cohort Study. CLS Working Paper 2010/7.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
