Determination of a single, universal threshold for caesarean section rate is not the way forward
- PMID: 27664175
- PMCID: PMC5256379
- DOI: 10.1136/ebmed-2016-110393
Determination of a single, universal threshold for caesarean section rate is not the way forward
Conflict of interest statement
All the authors were involved in the 2015 WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates and are coauthors of the syst6ematics review and analyses that formed the basis for the Statement and that are cited in the Commentary.
Comment on
-
Relationship Between Cesarean Delivery Rate and Maternal and Neonatal Mortality.JAMA. 2015 Dec 1;314(21):2263-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.15553. JAMA. 2015. PMID: 26624825
References
-
- Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, et al. . What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies. Reprod Health 2015;12:57 doi:10.1186/s12978-015-0043-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- World Health Organization WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2015. (WHO/RHR/15.02).
-
- Betrán AP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, et al. . WHO Working Group on Caesarean Section. Commentary: WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. BJOG 2015. Published Online First: 22 Jul 2015. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13526
-
- WHO. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet 1985;2:436–7. - PubMed
-
- Ye J, Zhang J, Mikolajczyk R, et al. . Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population-based ecological study with longitudinal data. BJOG 2015. Published Online First: 24 Aug 2015. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13592 doi:10.1111/1471-0528.13592 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical