Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov;11(3):199-205.
doi: 10.1007/s11751-016-0265-3. Epub 2016 Sep 24.

The use of blocking screws with internal lengthening nail and reverse rule of thumb for blocking screws in limb lengthening and deformity correction surgery

Affiliations

The use of blocking screws with internal lengthening nail and reverse rule of thumb for blocking screws in limb lengthening and deformity correction surgery

Saravanaraja Muthusamy et al. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Internal lengthening nail (ILN) is a recent development in limb lengthening and deformity correction specialty. The ILN has the distinct advantage of combining acute deformity correction with gradual lengthening of bone. While using ILN, the short metaphyseal bone fragment may develop a deformity at the time of osteotomy and nail insertion or during bone lengthening because of the wide medullary canal. These deformities are typically predictable, and blocking screws (Poller screws) are helpful in these situations. This manuscript describes the common deformities that occur in femur and tibia with osteotomies at different locations while using ILN in antegrade and retrograde nailing technique. Also, a systematic approach to the appropriate use of blocking screws in these deformities is described. In addition, the "reverse rule of thumb" is introduced as a quick reference to determine the ideal location(s) and number of blocking screws. These principles are applicable to limb lengthening and deformity correction as well as fracture fixation using intramedullary nails.

Keywords: Blocking screws; Deformity correction; Intramedullary lengthening nail; Limb lengthening; Reverse rule of thumb.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Saravanaraja Muthusamy declares no conflict of interest. S Robert Rozbruch, is a consultant with and receives payment for lectures including service on speakers’ bureaus from Smith and Nephew and receives royalties from Small Bone Innovations. Austin T. Fragomen is a consultant with Synthes and Smith and Nephew and receives payment for lectures including service on speakers’ bureaus from Smith and Nephew. Statement of human and animal rights All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent For this kind of study formal consent is not required.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Holding the bone with the thumbs and index fingers of both hands as if you are manually trying to correct the deformity. The thumbs of both hands are placed on the convex side of the deformity near the apex or osteotomy site, and the index fingers are placed away from the apex or osteotomy site on the concave side. b The gray bar with black outline represents nail. The red circles indicate the locations where the blocking screws should be inserted. They are inserted adjacent to the nail on the side that is OPPOSITE to where the thumbs and index fingers are placed on the bone
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a Correction of distal femur varus deformity: The thumbs of both hands are placed laterally over the apex of the deformity, and the index fingers are placed on the concave side away from the apex. The red dotted line indicates the osteotomy site, and the blue arrows indicate the direction of force to correct the deformity. The black dots indicate the locations where the blocking screws should be inserted using the reverse rule of thumb. They are inserted on the side that is OPPOSITE to where the thumbs and index fingers are placed on the bone. b Correction of distal femur procurvatum deformity: The bone is not deformed, but the distal fragment is expected develop procurvatum deformity during lengthening. The thumbs of both hands are placed anteriorly where the apex of the procurvatum deformity would lie. The black dots indicate the locations where the blocking screws should be inserted. c Correction of mid tibia valgus deformity: The black dots indicate the locations of blocking screws. d Correction of proximal tibia procurvatum deformity: The bone is not deformed, but the proximal fragment is expected develop procurvatum deformity during lengthening. The black dots indicate the locations of blocking screws
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Antegrade femoral nail. a, b Represent radiographs taken at early distraction and consolidation phases, respectively. Blocking screws were not needed in the proximal fragment. One medial screw and one lateral screw were inserted in the distal fragment near the osteotomy site to prevent varus or valgus tilt of the fragment
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Retrograde femoral nail with distal femoral osteotomy. Anteroposterior radiograph (a) and intraoperative fluoroscopic anteroposterior view (b) show two medial blocking screws, one in proximal fragment and one in the distal fragment near the osteotomy site used to prevent varus angulation of the proximal and distal fragments, respectively. Lateral radiograph (c) and the intraoperative fluoroscopic lateral view (d) show one posterior blocking screw in the distal fragment near the osteotomy site used to prevent procurvatum deformity
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Antegrade tibial nail with mid-tibial osteotomy. Preoperative anteroposterior (a) and lateral (b) radiographs show preexisting valgus deformity of mid tibia. One lateral blocking screw was inserted near the osteotomy site in the proximal fragment to avoid valgus deformity during lengthening. Also, a blocking screw was inserted posterior to the nail in the proximal fragment before the reaming to guide the nail. Radiographs (c, d) represent post operative anteroposterior and lateral views at the end of distraction, respectively

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rozbruch SR, Birch JG, Dahl MT, Herzenberg JE. Motorized intramedullary nail for management of limb-length discrepancy and deformity. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014;22:403–409. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-22-07-403. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kirane YM, Fragomen AT, Rozbruch SR. Precision of the PRECICE internal bone lengthening nail. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:3869–3878. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3575-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Krettek C, Miclau T, Schandelmaier P, Stephan C, Möhlmann U, Tscherne H. The mechanical effect of blocking screws (“Poller screws”) in stabilizing tibia fractures with short proximal or distal fragments after insertion of small-diameter intramedullary nails. J Orthop Trauma. 1999;13:550–553. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199911000-00006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Krettek C, Stephan C, Schandelmaier P, Richter M, Pape HC, Miclau T. The use of Poller screws as blocking screws in stabilising tibial fractures treated with small diameter intramedullary nails. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:963–968. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.81B6.10000. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kocaoglu M, Eralp L, Bilen FE, Balci HI. Fixator-assisted acute femoral deformity correction and consecutive lengthening over anintramedullary nail. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:152–159. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00114. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources