Reply from Authors re: Jens Uwe Stolzenburg, Iason Kyriazis, Evangelos Liatsikos. Postoperative Lymphocele Formation after Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection at the Time of Radical Prostatectomy Should Not Be Considered an Inevitable Consequence of the Approach. Eur Urol 2017;71:159-60: Which Lymphatic Vessels Have To Be Secured During Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Prostate Cancer?
- PMID: 27666998
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.09.023
Reply from Authors re: Jens Uwe Stolzenburg, Iason Kyriazis, Evangelos Liatsikos. Postoperative Lymphocele Formation after Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection at the Time of Radical Prostatectomy Should Not Be Considered an Inevitable Consequence of the Approach. Eur Urol 2017;71:159-60: Which Lymphatic Vessels Have To Be Secured During Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Prostate Cancer?
Comment on
-
Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Titanium Clips to Bipolar Coagulation in Sealing Lymphatic Vessels During Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection at the Time of Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.Eur Urol. 2017 Feb;71(2):155-158. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.006. Epub 2016 Aug 17. Eur Urol. 2017. PMID: 27544575 Clinical Trial.
-
Postoperative Lymphocele Formation after Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection at the Time of Radical Prostatectomy Should Not Be Considered an Inevitable Consequence of the Approach.Eur Urol. 2017 Feb;71(2):159-160. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.046. Epub 2016 Aug 29. Eur Urol. 2017. PMID: 27595375 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
