Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Aug;4(16):307.
doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.08.28.

PillCam colon capsule endoscopy (PCCE) in colonic diseases

Affiliations
Review

PillCam colon capsule endoscopy (PCCE) in colonic diseases

Dan Carter et al. Ann Transl Med. 2016 Aug.

Erratum in

Abstract

Diseases affecting the colon are common worldwide and can cause a major health problem. Colorectal cancer (CRC) as well as Inflammatory bowel diseases represent a major cause of morbidity and mortality in western countries. PillCam colon capsule endoscopy (PCCE) is a novel and promising technology that can be useful for the screening and monitoring of colonic diseases. In the recent years many articles examined the use of various versions of PCCE-the 1st and 2nd generation versus various other endoscopic or radiologic modalities both for detection of colonic polyps or cancer and in both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease. The aim of the current review is to provide up to date information regarding the use and usefulness of this method in these disease.

Keywords: Colon capsule; colon cancer; inflammatory bowel disease; polyp detection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The second generation colon capsule [adapted from (9)]. (A) The capsule; (B) the data recorder (DR3).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Colon capsule endoscopy—2 typical spectrum of findings.

References

    1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2015;65:87-108. 10.3322/caac.21262 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Edwards BK, Ward E, Kohler BA, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates. Cancer 2010;116:544-73. 10.1002/cncr.24760 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bujanda L, Sarasqueta C, Zubiaurre L, et al. Low adherence to colonoscopy in the screening of first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer. Gut 2007;56:1714-8. 10.1136/gut.2007.120709 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1403-12. - PubMed
    1. Villa NA, Pannala R, Pasha SF, et al. Alternatives to Incomplete Colonoscopy. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2015;17:43. 10.1007/s11894-015-0468-7 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources