Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug 26;4(1):1254.
doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1254. eCollection 2016.

An Automated Method for Identifying Individuals with a Lung Nodule Can Be Feasibly Implemented Across Health Systems

Affiliations

An Automated Method for Identifying Individuals with a Lung Nodule Can Be Feasibly Implemented Across Health Systems

Farhood Farjah et al. EGEMS (Wash DC). .

Abstract

Introduction: The incidence of incidentally detected lung nodules is rapidly rising, but little is known about their management or associated patient outcomes. One barrier to studying lung nodule care is the inability to efficiently and reliably identify the cohort of interest (i.e. cases). Investigators at Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) recently developed an automated method to identify individuals with an incidentally discovered lung nodule, but the feasibility of implementing this method across other health systems is unknown.

Methods: A random sample of Group Health (GH) members who had a computed tomography in 2012 underwent chart review to determine if a lung nodule was documented in the radiology report. A previously developed natural language processing (NLP) algorithm was implemented at our site using only knowledge of the key words, qualifiers, excluding terms, and the logic linking these parameters.

Results: Among 499 subjects, 156 (31%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 27-36%) had an incidentally detected lung nodule. NLP identified 189 (38%, 95% CI 33-42%) individuals with a nodule. The accuracy of NLP at GH was similar to its accuracy at KPSC: sensitivity 90% (95% CI 85-95%) and specificity 86% (95% CI 82-89%) versus sensitivity 96% (95% CI 88-100%) and specificity 86% (95% CI 75-94%).

Conclusion: Automated methods designed to identify individuals with an incidentally detected lung nodule can feasibly and independently be implemented across health systems. Use of these methods will likely facilitate the efficient conduct of multi-site studies evaluating practice patterns and associated outcomes.

Keywords: data collection; lung neoplasms; natural language processing; solitary pulmonary nodule.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Nodule Size Ascertained by NLP Versus Chart Abstraction Among Individuals with a Confirmed Lung Nodule
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Correlation Between Chart Abstracted and NLP Abstracted Nodule Size

References

    1. Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Lee C, Feigelson HS, Flynn M, et al. Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996–2010. JAMA. 2012;307(22):2400–2409. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gould MK, Tang T, Liu IA, Lee J, Zheng C, Danforth KN, et al. Recent Trends in the Identification of Incidental Pulmonary Nodules. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;192(10):1208–1214. - PubMed
    1. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team Results of initial low-dose computed tomographic screening for lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(21):1980–1991. - PMC - PubMed
    1. MacMahon H, Austin JHM, Gamsu G, Herold CJ, Jett JR, Naidich DP, et al. Guidelines for Management of Small Pulmonary Nodules Detected on CT Scans: A Statement from the Fleischner Society1. Radiology. 2005;237(2):395–400. - PubMed
    1. Tan BB, Flaherty KR, Kazerooni EA, Iannettoni MD, American College of Chest Physicians The solitary pulmonary nodule. Chest. 2003;123(1 Suppl):89S–96S. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources