Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Sep 27;35(1):153.
doi: 10.1186/s13046-016-0433-9.

Cell cycle checkpoint in cancer: a therapeutically targetable double-edged sword

Affiliations
Review

Cell cycle checkpoint in cancer: a therapeutically targetable double-edged sword

Roberta Visconti et al. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Major currently used anticancer therapeutics either directly damage DNA or target and upset basic cell division mechanisms like DNA replication and chromosome segregation. These insults elicit activation of cell cycle checkpoints, safeguard mechanisms that cells implement to correctly complete cell cycle phases, repair damage or eventually commit suicide in case damage is unrepairable. Although cancer cells appear to be advantageously defective in some aspects of checkpoint physiology, recent acquisitions on the biochemical mechanisms of the various checkpoints are offering new therapeutic approaches against cancer. Indeed, chemical manipulation of these mechanisms is providing new therapeutic strategies and tools to increase the killing efficacy of major cancer therapeutics as well as to directly promote cancer cell death. In this review we summarize developing concepts on how targeting cell cycle checkpoints may provide substantial improvement to cancer therapy.

Keywords: Cancer drug; Cell cycle checkpoint; Chk1; DNA damage; Fcp1; Mitosis; Spindle assembly checkpoint; Taxane; Vinca alkaloids; Wee1.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Targeting the cell cycle checkpoints in cancer. a Chk1/2 or ATR inhibitors in combination with DNA damaging drugs forces cancer cells with DNA damage to bypass the S and G2/M checkpoint arrest and enter mitosis, leading to cell death. b Wee1 inhibitors in combination with DNA damaging drugs forces cancer cells with DNA damage to bypass the G2/M checkpoint arrest and progress into mitosis, leading to cell death. c Wee1 inhibitors sustain the SAC-dependent mitotic delay induced by AMCDs, substantially increasing AMCDs therapeutic efficacy

References

    1. Jackson SP, Bartek J. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature. 2009;461:1071–1078. doi: 10.1038/nature08467. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Visconti R, Grieco D. New insights on oxidative stress in cancer. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2009;12:240–245. - PubMed
    1. Curtin NJ. DNA repair dysregulation from cancer driver to therapeutic target. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12:801–817. doi: 10.1038/nrc3399. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hunter T, Pines J. Cyclins and cancer. II: Cyclin D and CDK inhibitors come of age. Cell. 1994;79:573–582. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90543-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sherr CJ. Cancer cell cycles. Science. 1996;274:1672–1677. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5293.1672. - DOI - PubMed